Narrative:

This event is to describe a recurring problem on the laguardia one departure; which can result in a course deviation. Our clearance was to depart lga runway 4 -- vectors to white intersection -- then as filed. After climbing through 10000 feet; new york departure cleared us direct col; direct white then on course. Col is north of white and not in the FMS nor part of our clearance. During the past month; this is the 3RD time I've been cleared direct col; and it's always with a sense of urgency from the controller. They expect an immediate turn due to traffic but never offer a heading unless asked. Does ATC realize col is not part of our departure clearance? Complicating things further is the FMS. There are 2 col VOR's in the FMS so it asks the user to pick the correct one while ATC is demanding a turn. In this incident; we were in the turn towards col when ATC asked us if we were going direct. I don't believe any errors were made by us or ATC; but everyone seems to get frustrated by this clearance. I do not believe aircraft separation was violated. In hindsight; I should have asked for an initial heading to col. Because of the recurring problem; perhaps a note should be added to the dispatch release warning pilots ATC may issue a clearance to col when being vectored to white.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A CRJ-200 FLT CREW REPORTS WHEN DEPARTING LGA ON THE LGA1 DEP THEY ARE OFTEN CLEARED DIRECT COL VOR; WHICH IS NOT ON THE DEP ROUTE; OFTEN CAUSING CONFUSION RESULTING IN A DELAY IN MAKING THE TURN.

Narrative: THIS EVENT IS TO DESCRIBE A RECURRING PROBLEM ON THE LAGUARDIA ONE DEPARTURE; WHICH CAN RESULT IN A COURSE DEVIATION. OUR CLEARANCE WAS TO DEPART LGA RUNWAY 4 -- VECTORS TO WHITE INTERSECTION -- THEN AS FILED. AFTER CLIMBING THROUGH 10000 FEET; NEW YORK DEPARTURE CLEARED US DIRECT COL; DIRECT WHITE THEN ON COURSE. COL IS NORTH OF WHITE AND NOT IN THE FMS NOR PART OF OUR CLEARANCE. DURING THE PAST MONTH; THIS IS THE 3RD TIME I'VE BEEN CLEARED DIRECT COL; AND IT'S ALWAYS WITH A SENSE OF URGENCY FROM THE CONTROLLER. THEY EXPECT AN IMMEDIATE TURN DUE TO TRAFFIC BUT NEVER OFFER A HEADING UNLESS ASKED. DOES ATC REALIZE COL IS NOT PART OF OUR DEPARTURE CLEARANCE? COMPLICATING THINGS FURTHER IS THE FMS. THERE ARE 2 COL VOR'S IN THE FMS SO IT ASKS THE USER TO PICK THE CORRECT ONE WHILE ATC IS DEMANDING A TURN. IN THIS INCIDENT; WE WERE IN THE TURN TOWARDS COL WHEN ATC ASKED US IF WE WERE GOING DIRECT. I DON'T BELIEVE ANY ERRORS WERE MADE BY US OR ATC; BUT EVERYONE SEEMS TO GET FRUSTRATED BY THIS CLEARANCE. I DO NOT BELIEVE AIRCRAFT SEPARATION WAS VIOLATED. IN HINDSIGHT; I SHOULD HAVE ASKED FOR AN INITIAL HEADING TO COL. BECAUSE OF THE RECURRING PROBLEM; PERHAPS A NOTE SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE DISPATCH RELEASE WARNING PILOTS ATC MAY ISSUE A CLEARANCE TO COL WHEN BEING VECTORED TO WHITE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.