Narrative:

Captain PF in cruise FL360; .78 mach with autoplt on. Engine #2 stall ECAM. Captain xferred PF and radios to first officer while pulling throttle #2 to idle. As per flight manual procedures; recovered engine #2 -- though ff was a 2800 pounds (400 pounds higher than left side) and egt was 450 degrees C (100 degrees C higher than left side). A discussion with maintenance and dispatch was initiated to determine if the criteria for degraded engine existed. While discussing with maintenance and dispatcher; and starting a descent towards ZZZ1; engine #2 stall ECAM recurred. At this point the flight was over ZZZ and the decision was made to declare an emergency and divert to ZZZ. The crew treated the approach like a single engine approach though engine #2 was kept running at idle. Engine #2 while at idle did not show any further irregularities. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated that what actually initiated the engine failure is unknown; however on post flight it was discovered that many compressor blades had been damaged or destroyed. Reporter noted that recent training made this emergency almost a non event.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A320 FLT CREW EXPERIENCES AN ENGINE STALL AT FL360 AND DIVERTS AFTER THE ENGINE CANNOT BE MADE TO OPERATE ABOVE IDLE.

Narrative: CAPT PF IN CRUISE FL360; .78 MACH WITH AUTOPLT ON. ENG #2 STALL ECAM. CAPT XFERRED PF AND RADIOS TO FO WHILE PULLING THROTTLE #2 TO IDLE. AS PER FLT MANUAL PROCS; RECOVERED ENG #2 -- THOUGH FF WAS A 2800 LBS (400 LBS HIGHER THAN L SIDE) AND EGT WAS 450 DEGS C (100 DEGS C HIGHER THAN L SIDE). A DISCUSSION WITH MAINT AND DISPATCH WAS INITIATED TO DETERMINE IF THE CRITERIA FOR DEGRADED ENG EXISTED. WHILE DISCUSSING WITH MAINT AND DISPATCHER; AND STARTING A DSCNT TOWARDS ZZZ1; ENG #2 STALL ECAM RECURRED. AT THIS POINT THE FLT WAS OVER ZZZ AND THE DECISION WAS MADE TO DECLARE AN EMER AND DIVERT TO ZZZ. THE CREW TREATED THE APCH LIKE A SINGLE ENG APCH THOUGH ENG #2 WAS KEPT RUNNING AT IDLE. ENG #2 WHILE AT IDLE DID NOT SHOW ANY FURTHER IRREGULARITIES. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATED THAT WHAT ACTUALLY INITIATED THE ENGINE FAILURE IS UNKNOWN; HOWEVER ON POST FLIGHT IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT MANY COMPRESSOR BLADES HAD BEEN DAMAGED OR DESTROYED. RPTR NOTED THAT RECENT TRAINING MADE THIS EMERGENCY ALMOST A NON EVENT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.