Narrative:

Conducted normal approach briefing. We were planning the SEAVU1 to runway 25R then changed to SEAVU1 runway 24R. Briefed and rebriefed. Passing palac intersection at 7000 ft per the SID. We descended to 4000 ft for the next crossing (at or above 4000 ft). At 6000 ft at PAL06 we think that approach clearance was not given. The first officer leveled off and I requested approach clearance. We continued for an otherwise normal approach and landing. We think the controller forgot to issue clearance as he was very busy. However he very well may have given us clearance earlier; but neither of us remember hearing or responding. This is a very confusing approach to 3 possible runways. Also in the FMGC there is a point called PAL06 which is not on the STAR or approach charts.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A LATER RWY CHANGE; A BUSY APCH CTLR AND A POSSIBLE MISSED CLRNC CAUSE CONFUSION ON THE SEAVU ARR TO LAX BY AN A320.

Narrative: CONDUCTED NORMAL APCH BRIEFING. WE WERE PLANNING THE SEAVU1 TO RWY 25R THEN CHANGED TO SEAVU1 RWY 24R. BRIEFED AND REBRIEFED. PASSING PALAC INTXN AT 7000 FT PER THE SID. WE DSNDED TO 4000 FT FOR THE NEXT XING (AT OR ABOVE 4000 FT). AT 6000 FT AT PAL06 WE THINK THAT APCH CLRNC WAS NOT GIVEN. THE FO LEVELED OFF AND I REQUESTED APCH CLRNC. WE CONTINUED FOR AN OTHERWISE NORMAL APCH AND LNDG. WE THINK THE CTLR FORGOT TO ISSUE CLRNC AS HE WAS VERY BUSY. HOWEVER HE VERY WELL MAY HAVE GIVEN US CLRNC EARLIER; BUT NEITHER OF US REMEMBER HEARING OR RESPONDING. THIS IS A VERY CONFUSING APCH TO 3 POSSIBLE RWYS. ALSO IN THE FMGC THERE IS A POINT CALLED PAL06 WHICH IS NOT ON THE STAR OR APCH CHARTS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.