Narrative:

Our initial clearance from ewr was newark 7 departure off runway 22R; then as filed; except maintain 2500 ft; and expect higher in 10 minutes. Standard procedures were followed and the proper takeoff briefing was given by myself including the level off at 2500 ft. I made the decision that it would be easier to hand fly the departure. I tuned the localizer for runway 22L for DME information; and selected the course bug to 190 degrees to remind me of my first heading. Then; selected 220 degrees to the heading which was planned to remind me to turn at 2.3 DME. Standard procedures were followed on takeoff. I called for speed mode and heading mode on departure. I realized the flight director was giving me erroneous information and chose not to follow it. I turned to the heading of 190 degrees; which was set in the course bug. From then I followed the DME of the localizer for information on when to turn to 220 degrees. Primary focus was given to the heading and altitude not enough. While I was focused on DME and heading; the captain was trying to call departure. We both had our primary attention away from altitude which caused the deviation. Situational awareness in my opinion; could've been better by use of automation and autopilot rather than making the decision to hand fly.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CRJ200 FLT CREW HAS AN ALT DEV DURING THE EWR DEP.

Narrative: OUR INITIAL CLEARANCE FROM EWR WAS NEWARK 7 DEP OFF RWY 22R; THEN AS FILED; EXCEPT MAINTAIN 2500 FT; AND EXPECT HIGHER IN 10 MINUTES. STANDARD PROCEDURES WERE FOLLOWED AND THE PROPER TAKEOFF BRIEFING WAS GIVEN BY MYSELF INCLUDING THE LEVEL OFF AT 2500 FT. I MADE THE DECISION THAT IT WOULD BE EASIER TO HAND FLY THE DEP. I TUNED THE LOCALIZER FOR RWY 22L FOR DME INFORMATION; AND SELECTED THE COURSE BUG TO 190 DEGS TO REMIND ME OF MY FIRST HEADING. THEN; SELECTED 220 DEGS TO THE HEADING WHICH WAS PLANNED TO REMIND ME TO TURN AT 2.3 DME. STANDARD PROCS WERE FOLLOWED ON TKOF. I CALLED FOR SPEED MODE AND HEADING MODE ON DEP. I REALIZED THE FLIGHT DIRECTOR WAS GIVING ME ERRONEOUS INFORMATION AND CHOSE NOT TO FOLLOW IT. I TURNED TO THE HEADING OF 190 DEGS; WHICH WAS SET IN THE COURSE BUG. FROM THEN I FOLLOWED THE DME OF THE LOCALIZER FOR INFORMATION ON WHEN TO TURN TO 220 DEGS. PRIMARY FOCUS WAS GIVEN TO THE HEADING AND ALTITUDE NOT ENOUGH. WHILE I WAS FOCUSED ON DME AND HEADING; THE CAPT WAS TRYING TO CALL DEP. WE BOTH HAD OUR PRIMARY ATTENTION AWAY FROM ALT WHICH CAUSED THE DEVIATION. SITUATIONAL AWARENESS IN MY OPINION; COULD'VE BEEN BETTER BY USE OF AUTOMATION AND AUTOPILOT RATHER THAN MAKING THE DECISION TO HAND FLY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.