Narrative:

We received a revised engineering order; B757; from engineering. This engineering order extended the repair time to 200 cycles from 100 cycles. This was previously deferred. Parts of the requirements of revision a were to repair within 100 cycles and accomplish a visual inspection each flight day. When we went to revise the deferral we noticed the every flight day visual inspections had not been accomplished. The deferral was not flagged properly in the computer system. The deferral was corrected and the inspection checked and worked. This deferral was audited daily and the mistake should have been caught. It was originally deferred apr/xa/06.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B757 HAD AN ENGINEERING ORDER FOR A REPAIR REVISED FROM 100 CYCLES TO 200 CYCLES. ON REVIEW IT WAS DISCOVERED THE DAILY INSPECTIONS WERE NOT ACCOMPLISHED.

Narrative: WE RECEIVED A REVISED ENGINEERING ORDER; B757; FROM ENGINEERING. THIS ENGINEERING ORDER EXTENDED THE REPAIR TIME TO 200 CYCLES FROM 100 CYCLES. THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY DEFERRED. PARTS OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF REVISION A WERE TO REPAIR WITHIN 100 CYCLES AND ACCOMPLISH A VISUAL INSPECTION EACH FLT DAY. WHEN WE WENT TO REVISE THE DEFERRAL WE NOTICED THE EVERY FLT DAY VISUAL INSPECTIONS HAD NOT BEEN ACCOMPLISHED. THE DEFERRAL WAS NOT FLAGGED PROPERLY IN THE COMPUTER SYS. THE DEFERRAL WAS CORRECTED AND THE INSPECTION CHKED AND WORKED. THIS DEFERRAL WAS AUDITED DAILY AND THE MISTAKE SHOULD HAVE BEEN CAUGHT. IT WAS ORIGINALLY DEFERRED APR/XA/06.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.