Narrative:

Contacted ground. Informed VFR departure northbound with ATIS with understanding of filing a VFR pre departure clearance. Controller cleared runway 2R via taxiway C highspd runway 15. I requested runway 33. Controller 'unavailable.' I responded 'ok.' pwred down radio to run the before start checklist. After engine start; called ground for taxi. Controller aggressively inquired our whereabouts; why we haven't moved; told us to call the tower for possible FAA violation; and stated that this is a set time between clearance to aircraft movement and said that it is an far. He was; of course; incorrect; but after flight I verified by reviewing pubs. Shut down engine and called ground controller via cell phone. He repeats aggressive position. Debate back and forth over semantics. Stated there would be a violation filed. Requested to speak to supervisor. The controller said that the supervisor was not on duty. I requested the controller's name for reference but he would not yield name. I inquired if I needed to file any counter written report or (NASA). Also inquired if runway incursion; or traffic conflict. Controller reply; 'none but could have.' I responded 'we have not moved from our non movement area; how could we have possibly conflicted with any traffic or runway incursion?' after a very unproductive debate; I asked again if any action was to be taken. The controller implied no action will be taken. I then departed with no further issue. Inquired with union as to follow-up. They reply no action taken or required. In summary: I incorrectly thought a pre departure clearance was required and made the first contact with that in mind; as experienced in class B or class C airports. A mistake on the conservative side of safety. I was incorrect to power down radio for engine start as per checklist without indicating to controller. I was wrongly out of communication for approximately 2-4 mins with executing the before engine start checklist. The controller used poor judgement in his unprofessional threat of violation and tongue lashing over the frequency demonstrated a poor understanding of pilot controller responsibilities.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: C180 PLT IN A NON MOVEMENT AREA ON THE ARPT CALLED GND CTL FOR TAXI INFO BEFORE STARTING ENG. AFTER ENG START; THE PLT CALLED GND CTL FOR TAXI AND WAS THREATENED WITH A VIOLATION FOR NOT TAXIING IN A TIMELY MANNER.

Narrative: CONTACTED GND. INFORMED VFR DEP NBOUND WITH ATIS WITH UNDERSTANDING OF FILING A VFR PDC. CTLR CLRED RWY 2R VIA TXWY C HIGHSPD RWY 15. I REQUESTED RWY 33. CTLR 'UNAVAILABLE.' I RESPONDED 'OK.' PWRED DOWN RADIO TO RUN THE BEFORE START CHKLIST. AFTER ENG START; CALLED GND FOR TAXI. CTLR AGGRESSIVELY INQUIRED OUR WHEREABOUTS; WHY WE HAVEN'T MOVED; TOLD US TO CALL THE TWR FOR POSSIBLE FAA VIOLATION; AND STATED THAT THIS IS A SET TIME BTWN CLRNC TO ACFT MOVEMENT AND SAID THAT IT IS AN FAR. HE WAS; OF COURSE; INCORRECT; BUT AFTER FLT I VERIFIED BY REVIEWING PUBS. SHUT DOWN ENG AND CALLED GND CTLR VIA CELL PHONE. HE REPEATS AGGRESSIVE POS. DEBATE BACK AND FORTH OVER SEMANTICS. STATED THERE WOULD BE A VIOLATION FILED. REQUESTED TO SPEAK TO SUPVR. THE CTLR SAID THAT THE SUPVR WAS NOT ON DUTY. I REQUESTED THE CTLR'S NAME FOR REF BUT HE WOULD NOT YIELD NAME. I INQUIRED IF I NEEDED TO FILE ANY COUNTER WRITTEN RPT OR (NASA). ALSO INQUIRED IF RWY INCURSION; OR TFC CONFLICT. CTLR REPLY; 'NONE BUT COULD HAVE.' I RESPONDED 'WE HAVE NOT MOVED FROM OUR NON MOVEMENT AREA; HOW COULD WE HAVE POSSIBLY CONFLICTED WITH ANY TFC OR RWY INCURSION?' AFTER A VERY UNPRODUCTIVE DEBATE; I ASKED AGAIN IF ANY ACTION WAS TO BE TAKEN. THE CTLR IMPLIED NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN. I THEN DEPARTED WITH NO FURTHER ISSUE. INQUIRED WITH UNION AS TO FOLLOW-UP. THEY REPLY NO ACTION TAKEN OR REQUIRED. IN SUMMARY: I INCORRECTLY THOUGHT A PDC WAS REQUIRED AND MADE THE FIRST CONTACT WITH THAT IN MIND; AS EXPERIENCED IN CLASS B OR CLASS C ARPTS. A MISTAKE ON THE CONSERVATIVE SIDE OF SAFETY. I WAS INCORRECT TO PWR DOWN RADIO FOR ENG START AS PER CHKLIST WITHOUT INDICATING TO CTLR. I WAS WRONGLY OUT OF COM FOR APPROX 2-4 MINS WITH EXECUTING THE BEFORE ENG START CHKLIST. THE CTLR USED POOR JUDGEMENT IN HIS UNPROFESSIONAL THREAT OF VIOLATION AND TONGUE LASHING OVER THE FREQ DEMONSTRATED A POOR UNDERSTANDING OF PLT CTLR RESPONSIBILITIES.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.