![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 677916 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200511 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | navaid : gbn.vortac |
| State Reference | AZ |
| Altitude | msl single value : 33000 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC Mixed |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | artcc : zla.artcc |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | Citation X |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | cruise : level |
| Route In Use | enroute airway : j18.airway |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | other |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 13000 flight time type : 5000 |
| ASRS Report | 677916 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | other |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : multi engine pilot : cfi pilot : commercial pilot : flight engineer |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 6000 flight time type : 1000 |
| ASRS Report | 677908 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical airspace violation : entry non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance controller : issued alert flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Aircraft ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
We had departed san en route to tus. We were filed for and cleared for the dingo 5 arrival which I loaded into the FMS and reviewed with the PF. We received WX on the afis system which showed winds to be very strong out of the southwest. I changed the landing runway to runway 21. In the process; the FMS dropped the dingo 5 arrival. Then called the destination FBO to confirm our passenger transportation. When I got off the phone; I noticed that we had received a vector of 360 degrees. I asked the PF what we were on vectors for. He said we were given the vector to exit restricted airspace. When I had changed the runway to runway 21; the FMS had dropped the arrival and instead had changed to a direct course to the tus airport. We had previously reviewed the arrival loaded in the FMS and had not realized that it had been dropped because the dingo 5 arrival does not serve runway 21. There is no message generated on the honeywell system to alert us to this. In the future; each time a runway change is entered into the FMS; a review of the assigned arrival should be accomplished. A contributing factor was the fact that one pilot was occupied with extraneous activities.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C750 PENETRATES RESTRICTED AIRSPACE WHEN PROGRAMMING OF NEW RWY AT TUS RESULTS IN FMC DELETING DINGO ARR AND SUBSTITUTING DIRECT TUS.
Narrative: WE HAD DEPARTED SAN ENRTE TO TUS. WE WERE FILED FOR AND CLRED FOR THE DINGO 5 ARR WHICH I LOADED INTO THE FMS AND REVIEWED WITH THE PF. WE RECEIVED WX ON THE AFIS SYSTEM WHICH SHOWED WINDS TO BE VERY STRONG OUT OF THE SW. I CHANGED THE LNDG RWY TO RWY 21. IN THE PROCESS; THE FMS DROPPED THE DINGO 5 ARR. THEN CALLED THE DEST FBO TO CONFIRM OUR PAX TRANSPORTATION. WHEN I GOT OFF THE PHONE; I NOTICED THAT WE HAD RECEIVED A VECTOR OF 360 DEGS. I ASKED THE PF WHAT WE WERE ON VECTORS FOR. HE SAID WE WERE GIVEN THE VECTOR TO EXIT RESTRICTED AIRSPACE. WHEN I HAD CHANGED THE RWY TO RWY 21; THE FMS HAD DROPPED THE ARR AND INSTEAD HAD CHANGED TO A DIRECT COURSE TO THE TUS ARPT. WE HAD PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED THE ARR LOADED IN THE FMS AND HAD NOT REALIZED THAT IT HAD BEEN DROPPED BECAUSE THE DINGO 5 ARR DOES NOT SERVE RWY 21. THERE IS NO MESSAGE GENERATED ON THE HONEYWELL SYSTEM TO ALERT US TO THIS. IN THE FUTURE; EACH TIME A RWY CHANGE IS ENTERED INTO THE FMS; A REVIEW OF THE ASSIGNED ARR SHOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED. A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR WAS THE FACT THAT ONE PLT WAS OCCUPIED WITH EXTRANEOUS ACTIVITIES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.