Narrative:

Aircraft X arrived ZZZ with the #2 fuel quantity on MEL 28-6. During 'west/a' inspection it was noted that the #2 tank forward boost pump low pressure light was inoperative. Prior to departure maintenance control asked if I would accept MEL 28-1. I contacted ZZZ operations to see if this would have an impact on the expected load. Jnu operations said it would be no problem. I then advised maintenance control to go ahead with the MEL. I added the required amount of fuel per MEL 28-1 and the flight departed. The maintenance controller advised me of the incorrect assignment of the MEL after the aircraft had landed in ZZZ1. It was found that MEL 28-1B and 28-6 were not compatible. There is no reference in MEL 28-1 to also reference MEL 28-6, unfortunately I trusted that maintenance control had issued the correct MEL and maintenance procedures. I looked at MEL 28-1 and added the fuel that it required but failed to also check MEL 28-6 for any anomalies associated with it. According to maintenance control, neither the manufacturer's master MEL or the ddpg (dispatcher manual) list the exclusion in MEL 28-1 in regards to MEL 28-1, although MEL 28-6 does list the MEL 28-1 exclusion. In my opinion every excluded MEL should be xrefed to the other excluded MEL to aid in applicability determination.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-400 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE OF THE MEL WITH #2 TANK FUEL QUANTITY INOP AND #2 TANK FORWARD BOOST PUMP LOW PRESSURE WARNING LIGHT INOP.

Narrative: ACFT X ARRIVED ZZZ WITH THE #2 FUEL QUANTITY ON MEL 28-6. DURING 'W/A' INSPECTION IT WAS NOTED THAT THE #2 TANK FORWARD BOOST PUMP LOW PRESSURE LIGHT WAS INOP. PRIOR TO DEP MAINT CTL ASKED IF I WOULD ACCEPT MEL 28-1. I CONTACTED ZZZ OPS TO SEE IF THIS WOULD HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE EXPECTED LOAD. JNU OPS SAID IT WOULD BE NO PROB. I THEN ADVISED MAINT CTL TO GO AHEAD WITH THE MEL. I ADDED THE REQUIRED AMOUNT OF FUEL PER MEL 28-1 AND THE FLT DEPARTED. THE MAINT CTLR ADVISED ME OF THE INCORRECT ASSIGNMENT OF THE MEL AFTER THE ACFT HAD LANDED IN ZZZ1. IT WAS FOUND THAT MEL 28-1B AND 28-6 WERE NOT COMPATIBLE. THERE IS NO REF IN MEL 28-1 TO ALSO REF MEL 28-6, UNFORTUNATELY I TRUSTED THAT MAINT CTL HAD ISSUED THE CORRECT MEL AND MAINT PROCS. I LOOKED AT MEL 28-1 AND ADDED THE FUEL THAT IT REQUIRED BUT FAILED TO ALSO CHK MEL 28-6 FOR ANY ANOMALIES ASSOCIATED WITH IT. ACCORDING TO MAINT CTL, NEITHER THE MANUFACTURER'S MASTER MEL OR THE DDPG (DISPATCHER MANUAL) LIST THE EXCLUSION IN MEL 28-1 IN REGARDS TO MEL 28-1, ALTHOUGH MEL 28-6 DOES LIST THE MEL 28-1 EXCLUSION. IN MY OPINION EVERY EXCLUDED MEL SHOULD BE XREFED TO THE OTHER EXCLUDED MEL TO AID IN APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.