Narrative:

On climb out at 14000 ft, ATC advised a VFR king air at 1 O'clock position, at 14500 ft. We called 'traffic in sight' and were cleared to 16000 ft, and 'maintain visual separation from traffic.' during the turn at coate intersection, we passed 3-4 mi behind the king air on a diverging course. We got a 'nuisance' climb TA/RA due to the speed/time algorithm in TCASII. The question is: are we bound by the same controller separation limits (ie, snitch machine) after accepting a 'maintain visual separation clearance?' we were on a clearly diverging course-line as we passed through 14500 ft.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: F100 EXPERIENCED TCASII TA RA AFTER SIGHTING TFC AND ACCEPTING VISUAL SEPARATION CLRNC WITH ZNY AT 14000 FT.

Narrative: ON CLBOUT AT 14000 FT, ATC ADVISED A VFR KING AIR AT 1 O'CLOCK POS, AT 14500 FT. WE CALLED 'TFC IN SIGHT' AND WERE CLRED TO 16000 FT, AND 'MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION FROM TFC.' DURING THE TURN AT COATE INTXN, WE PASSED 3-4 MI BEHIND THE KING AIR ON A DIVERGING COURSE. WE GOT A 'NUISANCE' CLB TA/RA DUE TO THE SPD/TIME ALGORITHM IN TCASII. THE QUESTION IS: ARE WE BOUND BY THE SAME CTLR SEPARATION LIMITS (IE, SNITCH MACHINE) AFTER ACCEPTING A 'MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION CLRNC?' WE WERE ON A CLRLY DIVERGING COURSE-LINE AS WE PASSED THROUGH 14500 FT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.