Narrative:

On a VFR flight plan, I decided that I would not be able to maintain VMC. I decided to file an IFR flight plan, but after further consideration, decided to abort and divert. During conversation with approach, I was asked what my fuel state was. I reported 35 mins when actually I had over 1 hour of fuel on board. Controller declared an emergency for me. Once safely on the ground, I was ramp checked by the FAA. Safety inspector thought my decision to divert was a good one, but did not like my decision to launch due to WX telling me that VFR flight was not recommended.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: L29 PLT TAKES OFF INTO MARGINAL VFR CONDITIONS, DIVERTS DUE TO WX, AND IS RAMP CHKED BY AN FAA SAFETY INSPECTOR WHO DID NOT AGREE WITH THE DECISION TO TAKE OFF.

Narrative: ON A VFR FLT PLAN, I DECIDED THAT I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN VMC. I DECIDED TO FILE AN IFR FLT PLAN, BUT AFTER FURTHER CONSIDERATION, DECIDED TO ABORT AND DIVERT. DURING CONVERSATION WITH APCH, I WAS ASKED WHAT MY FUEL STATE WAS. I RPTED 35 MINS WHEN ACTUALLY I HAD OVER 1 HR OF FUEL ON BOARD. CTLR DECLARED AN EMER FOR ME. ONCE SAFELY ON THE GND, I WAS RAMP CHKED BY THE FAA. SAFETY INSPECTOR THOUGHT MY DECISION TO DIVERT WAS A GOOD ONE, BUT DID NOT LIKE MY DECISION TO LAUNCH DUE TO WX TELLING ME THAT VFR FLT WAS NOT RECOMMENDED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.