![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 617798 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200406 |
| Day | Tue |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : mtp.airport |
| State Reference | NY |
| Altitude | msl single value : 3000 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | Mixed |
| Weather Elements | Fog |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : pvd.tracon |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | Baron 58/58TC |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Navigation In Use | other |
| Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : pvd.tracon |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | PA-28 Cherokee Arrow IV |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | cruise : level |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | government : faa |
| Function | controller : approach |
| Qualification | controller : radar |
| ASRS Report | 617798 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | other |
| Function | flight crew : single pilot |
| Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 30 flight time total : 4000 flight time type : 2000 |
| ASRS Report | 617808 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : nmac inflight encounter : weather non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
| Consequence | faa : investigated faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 300 vertical : 100 |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
| Situations | |
| Chart | approach : rnav gps rwy 24 |
Narrative:
Aircraft X, BE58, was inbound to mtp airport at 5000 ft. Aircraft X was instructed to proceed to sey VOR, the initial approach fix for the GPS runway 24 approach at mtp. Aircraft Y, P28A, was northeast of sey swbound. Aircraft X was instructed to cross sey at 3000 ft and cleared for the GPS runway 24 approach. Aircraft X requested to proceed to feksa, an intermediate fix on the GPS approach. The pilot was then told to proceed to feksa and cleared for the approach. I expected the aircraft to proceed over feksa, then straight-in to mtp airport. The aircraft did an unexpected turn in the holding pattern at feksa which was northeast of the fix. The turn to the northeast put the 2 aircraft into conflict with each other and separation was lost. Supplemental information from acn 617808: this incident occurred while I was on an instrument approach, during a procedure turn. It was marginal VFR/IFR. I was cleared for an approach. There was confusion between myself and controller as to where to begin the approach. I specifically told him that a procedure turn would be required. While in a procedure turn, my TCASII warned me of an imminent collision, which required evasive diving to avoid a target that passed very close to my aircraft. I had thought that the airspace was free of other traffic while on the approach. I believe that between the confusion of this being a relatively new approach and a controller overload, a very close near miss occurred.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PROVIDENCE CTLR EXPERIENCED LOSS OF SEPARATION WHEN A BE58 MAKES UNEXPECTED TURN IN HOLDING PATTERN DURING GPS APCH TO MTP, CONFLICTING WITH ANOTHER IFR ACFT ON VECTOR TO FINAL.
Narrative: ACFT X, BE58, WAS INBOUND TO MTP ARPT AT 5000 FT. ACFT X WAS INSTRUCTED TO PROCEED TO SEY VOR, THE INITIAL APCH FIX FOR THE GPS RWY 24 APCH AT MTP. ACFT Y, P28A, WAS NE OF SEY SWBOUND. ACFT X WAS INSTRUCTED TO CROSS SEY AT 3000 FT AND CLRED FOR THE GPS RWY 24 APCH. ACFT X REQUESTED TO PROCEED TO FEKSA, AN INTERMEDIATE FIX ON THE GPS APCH. THE PLT WAS THEN TOLD TO PROCEED TO FEKSA AND CLRED FOR THE APCH. I EXPECTED THE ACFT TO PROCEED OVER FEKSA, THEN STRAIGHT-IN TO MTP ARPT. THE ACFT DID AN UNEXPECTED TURN IN THE HOLDING PATTERN AT FEKSA WHICH WAS NE OF THE FIX. THE TURN TO THE NE PUT THE 2 ACFT INTO CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER AND SEPARATION WAS LOST. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 617808: THIS INCIDENT OCCURRED WHILE I WAS ON AN INST APCH, DURING A PROC TURN. IT WAS MARGINAL VFR/IFR. I WAS CLRED FOR AN APCH. THERE WAS CONFUSION BTWN MYSELF AND CTLR AS TO WHERE TO BEGIN THE APCH. I SPECIFICALLY TOLD HIM THAT A PROC TURN WOULD BE REQUIRED. WHILE IN A PROC TURN, MY TCASII WARNED ME OF AN IMMINENT COLLISION, WHICH REQUIRED EVASIVE DIVING TO AVOID A TARGET THAT PASSED VERY CLOSE TO MY ACFT. I HAD THOUGHT THAT THE AIRSPACE WAS FREE OF OTHER TFC WHILE ON THE APCH. I BELIEVE THAT BTWN THE CONFUSION OF THIS BEING A RELATIVELY NEW APCH AND A CTLR OVERLOAD, A VERY CLOSE NEAR MISS OCCURRED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.