After noting another pilot not using standard CTAF procedures there is a conflict requiring a go aro...

Attributes
ACN	583652
Time
Date	200306
Day	Fri
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	airport : zzz.airport
State Reference	US
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	ground : position and hold ground : taxi
Flight Plan	None
Aircraft 2
Operator	general aviation : personal
Make Model Name	Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	descent : approach landing : go around
Route In Use	approach : traffic pattern
Flight Plan	None
Person 1
Affiliation	other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Qualification	pilot : instrument pilot : private
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 35 flight time total : 501 flight time type : 35
ASRS Report	583652
Person 2
Affiliation	other
Function	flight crew : single pilot
Events
Anomaly	conflict : ground less severe incursion : runway non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other other spatial deviation
Independent Detector	other flight crewa other flight crewb
Resolutory Action	flight crew : took evasive action flight crew : executed go around
Consequence	other Other
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Aircraft Airport Flight Crew Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance

Narrative:

I started my plane for a trip. I noticed the plane next to me hastily getting underway and taxiing down the ramp to the runway like he was in a hurry. He never did a run-up (none of my business) or announce ('if anyone was in the pattern...that I heard'). I had done my run-up at the parking position and proceeded down the ramp to the runway. I did announce 'anyone in the pattern' and with no response, I began to taxi down the 5000 ft runway to the runway numbers for departure. The intentions of the other pilot were not known. I got to the takeoff position (runway numbers) while monitoring my gauges all along. I turned and proceeded to depart when I noticed the fuel gauge never went up but slightly with very little pressure. I looked at it and decided to turn the electric fuel pump on and off to see a change. At this point our friendly pilot in the other plane was yelling at me frantically that I should depart. My comment to him was 'go around.' to this, the sensitive eared pilot, reported me to the safety counselor at our airport who insisted that I say the guy in the sky has priority and insisted I admit an error or he was reporting me to the FAA. I may have delayed departure for a very good reason and to go around was not a serious problem. I have had to do it many times, but this sensitive pilot seems to think it was a major problem to be inconvenienced. I agree the guy in the sky has priority but no emergency was stated and no indication that he was practicing 'touch and goes.' in fact, I only heard him on base and thought I had plenty of time. Note: our airport has the taxiway under construction so back taxiing is necessary for departure.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AFTER NOTING ANOTHER PLT NOT USING STANDARD CTAF PROCS THERE IS A CONFLICT REQUIRING A GAR WHEN THE RPTR DELAYS IN TKOF POS FOR FUEL INDICATION PROB AFTER BACK TAXI ON THE RWY REQUIRED BY ARPT CONSTRUCTION.

Narrative: I STARTED MY PLANE FOR A TRIP. I NOTICED THE PLANE NEXT TO ME HASTILY GETTING UNDERWAY AND TAXIING DOWN THE RAMP TO THE RWY LIKE HE WAS IN A HURRY. HE NEVER DID A RUN-UP (NONE OF MY BUSINESS) OR ANNOUNCE ('IF ANYONE WAS IN THE PATTERN...THAT I HEARD'). I HAD DONE MY RUN-UP AT THE PARKING POS AND PROCEEDED DOWN THE RAMP TO THE RWY. I DID ANNOUNCE 'ANYONE IN THE PATTERN' AND WITH NO RESPONSE, I BEGAN TO TAXI DOWN THE 5000 FT RWY TO THE RWY NUMBERS FOR DEP. THE INTENTIONS OF THE OTHER PLT WERE NOT KNOWN. I GOT TO THE TKOF POS (RWY NUMBERS) WHILE MONITORING MY GAUGES ALL ALONG. I TURNED AND PROCEEDED TO DEPART WHEN I NOTICED THE FUEL GAUGE NEVER WENT UP BUT SLIGHTLY WITH VERY LITTLE PRESSURE. I LOOKED AT IT AND DECIDED TO TURN THE ELECTRIC FUEL PUMP ON AND OFF TO SEE A CHANGE. AT THIS POINT OUR FRIENDLY PLT IN THE OTHER PLANE WAS YELLING AT ME FRANTICALLY THAT I SHOULD DEPART. MY COMMENT TO HIM WAS 'GO AROUND.' TO THIS, THE SENSITIVE EARED PLT, RPTED ME TO THE SAFETY COUNSELOR AT OUR ARPT WHO INSISTED THAT I SAY THE GUY IN THE SKY HAS PRIORITY AND INSISTED I ADMIT AN ERROR OR HE WAS RPTING ME TO THE FAA. I MAY HAVE DELAYED DEP FOR A VERY GOOD REASON AND TO GO AROUND WAS NOT A SERIOUS PROB. I HAVE HAD TO DO IT MANY TIMES, BUT THIS SENSITIVE PLT SEEMS TO THINK IT WAS A MAJOR PROB TO BE INCONVENIENCED. I AGREE THE GUY IN THE SKY HAS PRIORITY BUT NO EMER WAS STATED AND NO INDICATION THAT HE WAS PRACTICING 'TOUCH AND GOES.' IN FACT, I ONLY HEARD HIM ON BASE AND THOUGHT I HAD PLENTY OF TIME. NOTE: OUR ARPT HAS THE TXWY UNDER CONSTRUCTION SO BACK TAXIING IS NECESSARY FOR DEP.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

After noting another pilot not using standard CTAF procedures there is a conflict requiring a go around when the reporter delays in takeoff position for fuel indication problem after back taxi on the runway required by airport construction.