Narrative:

Given a descent from 7000 ft to 6000 ft by day approach. He advised us of traffic at our 12 O'clock position, which we saw on TCASII as 1800-1900 ft below us. TCASII changed from TA to RA as we leveled at 6000 ft. I disconnected the autoplt and initiated a climb as advised by our TCASII. At 7000 ft, TCASII advised traffic no longer a factor. We let dayton know we were complying with an RA immediately. At no time did we ever see our traffic visually. Dayton responded that he noticed our traffic climbing. We came within 400-500 ft vertically. We attempted to spot our traffic but, in MVFR, were not successful. In my experience, dayton is an overworked ATC facility. They do excellent work, but have numerous military/civilian/part 121 operations to manage.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B767 FLT CREW GIVEN ATC CLRNC TO DSND TO 6000 FT, BUT RECEIVES A TCASII 'CLB, CLB' RA. THE FLT CREW FOLLOWED THE TCASII, THEN NOTIFIED ATC.

Narrative: GIVEN A DSCNT FROM 7000 FT TO 6000 FT BY DAY APCH. HE ADVISED US OF TFC AT OUR 12 O'CLOCK POS, WHICH WE SAW ON TCASII AS 1800-1900 FT BELOW US. TCASII CHANGED FROM TA TO RA AS WE LEVELED AT 6000 FT. I DISCONNECTED THE AUTOPLT AND INITIATED A CLB AS ADVISED BY OUR TCASII. AT 7000 FT, TCASII ADVISED TFC NO LONGER A FACTOR. WE LET DAYTON KNOW WE WERE COMPLYING WITH AN RA IMMEDIATELY. AT NO TIME DID WE EVER SEE OUR TFC VISUALLY. DAYTON RESPONDED THAT HE NOTICED OUR TFC CLBING. WE CAME WITHIN 400-500 FT VERTLY. WE ATTEMPTED TO SPOT OUR TFC BUT, IN MVFR, WERE NOT SUCCESSFUL. IN MY EXPERIENCE, DAYTON IS AN OVERWORKED ATC FACILITY. THEY DO EXCELLENT WORK, BUT HAVE NUMEROUS MIL/CIVILIAN/PART 121 OPS TO MANAGE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.