Narrative:

Approach notified that cgf was using runway 24. WX favored runway 6 which was requested. Approach gave updated WX report and notified runway 24 was active. Based on WX, runway 24 was favored and requested. Approach vectored us for ILS runway 24 cgf and intercepted the localizer. We were #2 for the approach. Once visual contact with cgf, we were cleared for visual. Handoff to tower was made, aircraft position was reported, tower cleared us to land. Normal landing. Tower notified that runway 6 was the runway which landing was cleared for. No other events occurred. In the future to avoid this situation, more care should be made or taken to confirm positive communications and minimal confusion. Supplemental information from acn 564660: cleveland came back to us and said the 'tower said you can have runway 6 or runway 24.' we then told approach we would stay with runway 24. Approach said 'ok, you are cleared ILS runway 24.' we broke out of layer at about 1800 ft, called field in sight. Approach said 'cleared visual runway 24, contact tower.' we made contact with tower. Tower said, 'cleared to land.' we landed on runway 24. On rollout, tower said, 'you were cleared to land on runway 6.' at no time do the captain or I recall runway 6 being mentioned by the tower!

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: WRONG RWY LNDG AFTER A BE40 FLC PERFORMS A VISUAL APCH AFTER AN ILS TO RWY 24 AND LANDS ON RWY 24 AT CGF, OH.

Narrative: APCH NOTIFIED THAT CGF WAS USING RWY 24. WX FAVORED RWY 6 WHICH WAS REQUESTED. APCH GAVE UPDATED WX RPT AND NOTIFIED RWY 24 WAS ACTIVE. BASED ON WX, RWY 24 WAS FAVORED AND REQUESTED. APCH VECTORED US FOR ILS RWY 24 CGF AND INTERCEPTED THE LOC. WE WERE #2 FOR THE APCH. ONCE VISUAL CONTACT WITH CGF, WE WERE CLRED FOR VISUAL. HDOF TO TWR WAS MADE, ACFT POS WAS RPTED, TWR CLRED US TO LAND. NORMAL LNDG. TWR NOTIFIED THAT RWY 6 WAS THE RWY WHICH LNDG WAS CLRED FOR. NO OTHER EVENTS OCCURRED. IN THE FUTURE TO AVOID THIS SIT, MORE CARE SHOULD BE MADE OR TAKEN TO CONFIRM POSITIVE COMS AND MINIMAL CONFUSION. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 564660: CLEVELAND CAME BACK TO US AND SAID THE 'TWR SAID YOU CAN HAVE RWY 6 OR RWY 24.' WE THEN TOLD APCH WE WOULD STAY WITH RWY 24. APCH SAID 'OK, YOU ARE CLRED ILS RWY 24.' WE BROKE OUT OF LAYER AT ABOUT 1800 FT, CALLED FIELD IN SIGHT. APCH SAID 'CLRED VISUAL RWY 24, CONTACT TWR.' WE MADE CONTACT WITH TWR. TWR SAID, 'CLRED TO LAND.' WE LANDED ON RWY 24. ON ROLLOUT, TWR SAID, 'YOU WERE CLRED TO LAND ON RWY 6.' AT NO TIME DO THE CAPT OR I RECALL RWY 6 BEING MENTIONED BY THE TWR!

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.