A no conflict wrong runway landing when the CFI single pilot in a C172 lands on runway 23R vs runway...

Attributes
ACN	563047
Time
Date	200210
Day	Sun
Place
Locale Reference	airport : yip.airport
State Reference	MI
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	tower : yip.tower tower : rhv.tower
Operator	general aviation : instructional
Make Model Name	Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	landing : roll
Flight Plan	VFR
Person 1
Affiliation	other
Function	instruction : instructor oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : cfi
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 210 flight time total : 2800
ASRS Report	563047
Person 2
Affiliation	other
Function	instruction : trainee
Events
Anomaly	incursion : runway non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew
Supplementary
Problem Areas	ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

We were on a training event and returned to yip for a full stop landing. ATIS was reporting the active runways as 23L, 23R, and 32. We were the only airplane in the pattern. Tower cleared us to land. I heard and responded back 'cleared to land on 23R.' tower claims to have said 'cleared to land 32.' in any case, I was not corrected on my readback. I entered on right base for runway 23R and made a right turn to final runway 23R. I landed runway 23R and was told to taxi off on taxiway C. While taxiing off, the tower asked me what runway he cleared me to land on and I replayed runway 23R. That is when tower said, 'no, I cleared you for 32.' I was never told anything until after I had landed. Fortunately, no other traffic was in the area and no conflicts occurred. This situation could have been avoided if at any time during base or final tower had stated I was not flying what they wanted/cleared me for. I gave my apologies to the tower and it seems the matter was closed. I was never asked to call the tower. Taxied to the ramp without further discussion.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A NO CONFLICT WRONG RWY LNDG WHEN THE CFI SINGLE PLT IN A C172 LANDS ON RWY 23R VS RWY 32 AT YIP, MI.

Narrative: WE WERE ON A TRAINING EVENT AND RETURNED TO YIP FOR A FULL STOP LNDG. ATIS WAS RPTING THE ACTIVE RWYS AS 23L, 23R, AND 32. WE WERE THE ONLY AIRPLANE IN THE PATTERN. TWR CLRED US TO LAND. I HEARD AND RESPONDED BACK 'CLRED TO LAND ON 23R.' TWR CLAIMS TO HAVE SAID 'CLRED TO LAND 32.' IN ANY CASE, I WAS NOT CORRECTED ON MY READBACK. I ENTERED ON R BASE FOR RWY 23R AND MADE A R TURN TO FINAL RWY 23R. I LANDED RWY 23R AND WAS TOLD TO TAXI OFF ON TXWY C. WHILE TAXIING OFF, THE TWR ASKED ME WHAT RWY HE CLRED ME TO LAND ON AND I REPLAYED RWY 23R. THAT IS WHEN TWR SAID, 'NO, I CLRED YOU FOR 32.' I WAS NEVER TOLD ANYTHING UNTIL AFTER I HAD LANDED. FORTUNATELY, NO OTHER TFC WAS IN THE AREA AND NO CONFLICTS OCCURRED. THIS SIT COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED IF AT ANY TIME DURING BASE OR FINAL TWR HAD STATED I WAS NOT FLYING WHAT THEY WANTED/CLRED ME FOR. I GAVE MY APOLOGIES TO THE TWR AND IT SEEMS THE MATTER WAS CLOSED. I WAS NEVER ASKED TO CALL THE TWR. TAXIED TO THE RAMP WITHOUT FURTHER DISCUSSION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

A no conflict wrong runway landing when the CFI single pilot in a C172 lands on runway 23R vs runway 32 at yip, mi.