Narrative:

Had C182 do a missed approach, cleared the commuter for visual. The previous aircraft all did runway 33. When the commuter was shipped to tower, the commuter then asked for visual to runway 15. Tower approved. The commuter turned toward the C182 on missed and loss of separation occurred. If I would have held onto the commuter longer forcing it to stay south of the airport, separation would have been maintained.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B190 ON VISUAL APCH TO JST RWY 33 ASKED AND RECEIVED CLRNC FROM THE TWR TO LAND ON RWY 15. THE ACFT CONFLICTED WITH AN IFR C182 ON A RWY 33 MISSED APCH.

Narrative: HAD C182 DO A MISSED APCH, CLRED THE COMMUTER FOR VISUAL. THE PREVIOUS ACFT ALL DID RWY 33. WHEN THE COMMUTER WAS SHIPPED TO TWR, THE COMMUTER THEN ASKED FOR VISUAL TO RWY 15. TWR APPROVED. THE COMMUTER TURNED TOWARD THE C182 ON MISSED AND LOSS OF SEPARATION OCCURRED. IF I WOULD HAVE HELD ONTO THE COMMUTER LONGER FORCING IT TO STAY S OF THE ARPT, SEPARATION WOULD HAVE BEEN MAINTAINED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.