Narrative:

During his preflight the first officer discovered that he could not transmit at all. Not on communications #1 or #2 or PA's -- nothing. We had contract maintenance come to the aircraft, but after about 40 mins still did not have the problem fixed. Over the phone, maintenance had us defer VHF communication #2 using MEL 23-3 and continue to ZZZ1. En route, we read more carefully and realized that the MEL we used did not address the real problem. The audio panel on the first officer's side was not deferrable in the MEL's.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-300 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH THE FO UNABLE TO XMIT ON #1, #2 VHF COM, PA OR INTERPHONE, AND DEFERRED IN CONFLICT WITH THE MEL.

Narrative: DURING HIS PREFLT THE FO DISCOVERED THAT HE COULD NOT XMIT AT ALL. NOT ON COMS #1 OR #2 OR PA'S -- NOTHING. WE HAD CONTRACT MAINT COME TO THE ACFT, BUT AFTER ABOUT 40 MINS STILL DID NOT HAVE THE PROB FIXED. OVER THE PHONE, MAINT HAD US DEFER VHF COM #2 USING MEL 23-3 AND CONTINUE TO ZZZ1. ENRTE, WE READ MORE CAREFULLY AND REALIZED THAT THE MEL WE USED DID NOT ADDRESS THE REAL PROB. THE AUDIO PANEL ON THE FO'S SIDE WAS NOT DEFERRABLE IN THE MEL'S.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.