Narrative:

Air carrier X was eastbound climbing to FL230, turning from 090 degrees to direct grr VORTAC. Air carrier Y was wbound, descending to 14000 ft, direct sudds, direct mke. Strong westerly winds probably extended the turn direct grr, and I observed that lateral separation would be lost. I issued FL200 to air carrier Y, as the radar indicated descent through FL208. Air carrier Y leveled at FL200. I issued FL190 to air carrier X, but they were through FL190 already, and had to descend back, resulting in 400 ft vertical, 4.5 NM lateral. I could have maintained separation by stopping air carrier X first, or by telling both aircraft to 'maintain present altitude.' specifically, I underestimated air carrier X climb rate, in addition to initially projecting lateral separation.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ZAU TRAINEE CTLR ALLOWED OPPOSITE DIRECTION TFC, WBOUND CLBING AND EBOUND DSNDING, TO CONFLICT.

Narrative: ACR X WAS EBOUND CLBING TO FL230, TURNING FROM 090 DEGS TO DIRECT GRR VORTAC. ACR Y WAS WBOUND, DSNDING TO 14000 FT, DIRECT SUDDS, DIRECT MKE. STRONG WESTERLY WINDS PROBABLY EXTENDED THE TURN DIRECT GRR, AND I OBSERVED THAT LATERAL SEPARATION WOULD BE LOST. I ISSUED FL200 TO ACR Y, AS THE RADAR INDICATED DSCNT THROUGH FL208. ACR Y LEVELED AT FL200. I ISSUED FL190 TO ACR X, BUT THEY WERE THROUGH FL190 ALREADY, AND HAD TO DSND BACK, RESULTING IN 400 FT VERT, 4.5 NM LATERAL. I COULD HAVE MAINTAINED SEPARATION BY STOPPING ACR X FIRST, OR BY TELLING BOTH ACFT TO 'MAINTAIN PRESENT ALT.' SPECIFICALLY, I UNDERESTIMATED ACR X CLB RATE, IN ADDITION TO INITIALLY PROJECTING LATERAL SEPARATION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.