Narrative:

Aircraft type is B757. We were cleared for the tip toe visual approach to runway 28L and advised of traffic flying the charted visual to runway 28R, an air carrier Y B767. The B767 was initially very slightly behind us, but because of a faster approach speed, passed us at approximately 1200 ft AGL. We landed slightly behind him. At approximately 30 ft AGL, our left wing dropped about 15-20 degrees with almost full left aileron to compensate. A go around was initiated. Touchdown occurred before go around thrust and increased pitch attitude took effect. We apparently encountered wake turbulence from the heavy aircraft on the parallel runway. I don't believe anyone involved did anything wrong, which highlights the question of the safety of sfo charted visual approachs when wake turbulence is considered.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B757, ALMOST IN LNDG FLAIR, EXECUTES GAR DUE TO WAKE TURB CAUSED FROM LNDG B767 LNDG ON PARALLEL RWY AT SFO.

Narrative: ACFT TYPE IS B757. WE WERE CLEARED FOR THE TIP TOE VISUAL APCH TO RWY 28L AND ADVISED OF TFC FLYING THE CHARTED VISUAL TO RWY 28R, AN ACR Y B767. THE B767 WAS INITIALLY VERY SLIGHTLY BEHIND US, BUT BECAUSE OF A FASTER APCH SPD, PASSED US AT APPROX 1200 FT AGL. WE LANDED SLIGHTLY BEHIND HIM. AT APPROX 30 FT AGL, OUR L WING DROPPED ABOUT 15-20 DEGS WITH ALMOST FULL L AILERON TO COMPENSATE. A GAR WAS INITIATED. TOUCHDOWN OCCURRED BEFORE GAR THRUST AND INCREASED PITCH ATTITUDE TOOK EFFECT. WE APPARENTLY ENCOUNTERED WAKE TURB FROM THE HEAVY ACFT ON THE PARALLEL RWY. I DON'T BELIEVE ANYONE INVOLVED DID ANYTHING WRONG, WHICH HIGHLIGHTS THE QUESTION OF THE SAFETY OF SFO CHARTED VISUAL APCHS WHEN WAKE TURB IS CONSIDERED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.