![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 515145 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 200106 | 
| Day | Mon | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : phl.airport | 
| State Reference | PA | 
| Altitude | agl single value : 0 | 
| Environment | |
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : phl.tower tracon : m98.tracon  | 
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier | 
| Make Model Name | A321 | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 | 
| Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : roll  | 
| Route In Use | approach : visual | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier | 
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic  | 
| Qualification | pilot : atp | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 210 flight time total : 14500 flight time type : 10  | 
| ASRS Report | 515145 | 
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier | 
| Function | flight crew : first officer | 
| Qualification | pilot : atp | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 4500 flight time type : 550  | 
| ASRS Report | 514976 | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ground encounters other other anomaly  | 
| Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa other flight crewb  | 
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : regained aircraft control | 
| Consequence | other | 
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance  | 
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance | 
Narrative:
Tail strike on landing at phl. The aircraft has a different flap system than the A319-320. The nose attitude and aircraft feel are different in the landing phase. On landing at phl, I flew a stabilized coupled approach to 400 ft AGL. I then disconnected the autoplt. WX was clear, winds 360 degrees at 9 KTS, landing runway 27R. At 50 ft, as operations procedure requires, I retarded the power and performed what I thought was a normal transition to the landing attitude. The rate of descent did not decrease at the normal rate. I was applying back pressure when the aircraft made a firm touchdown and the nose pitched up resulting in a tail strike.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A321 FO LOST CTL OF THE ACFT DURING LNDG FLARE RESULTING IN A HARD LNDG AND A TAIL STRIKE. THE AFT TAILSKID AREA OF THE FUSELAGE WAS SCRAPED AND DAMAGED.
Narrative: TAIL STRIKE ON LNDG AT PHL. THE ACFT HAS A DIFFERENT FLAP SYS THAN THE A319-320. THE NOSE ATTITUDE AND ACFT FEEL ARE DIFFERENT IN THE LNDG PHASE. ON LNDG AT PHL, I FLEW A STABILIZED COUPLED APCH TO 400 FT AGL. I THEN DISCONNECTED THE AUTOPLT. WX WAS CLR, WINDS 360 DEGS AT 9 KTS, LNDG RWY 27R. AT 50 FT, AS OPS PROC REQUIRES, I RETARDED THE PWR AND PERFORMED WHAT I THOUGHT WAS A NORMAL TRANSITION TO THE LNDG ATTITUDE. THE RATE OF DSCNT DID NOT DECREASE AT THE NORMAL RATE. I WAS APPLYING BACK PRESSURE WHEN THE ACFT MADE A FIRM TOUCHDOWN AND THE NOSE PITCHED UP RESULTING IN A TAIL STRIKE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.