Narrative:

Flight attendant reported a metallic 'rolling, banging' noise on ground in ZZZ. Maintenance looked for source but found nothing. Upon arrival in XXX, flight attendant reported that noise was still there (during rollout at high speed). Captain elected not to summon maintenance until return to ZZZ, which I concurred with due to apparent minor nature of problem and earlier maintenance inspection. In retrospect, however, we should have summoned (contract) maintenance in XXX (an outstation). Clearly the noise still existed. Perhaps not a big deal, perhaps a sign of a bigger problem. If it was important enough to write up, it should have been done no matter what our location. We were running late, no doubt that time pressure and our desire to return to base had some affect on our decision.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A CANADAIR CL65 WITH A FLT ATTENDANT RPT OF ROLLING AND BANGING NOISE ON THE GND IS NOT ENTERED IN THE LOGBOOK UNTIL ARRIVING AT A COMPANY MAINT STATION.

Narrative: FLT ATTENDANT RPTED A METALLIC 'ROLLING, BANGING' NOISE ON GND IN ZZZ. MAINT LOOKED FOR SOURCE BUT FOUND NOTHING. UPON ARR IN XXX, FLT ATTENDANT RPTED THAT NOISE WAS STILL THERE (DURING ROLLOUT AT HIGH SPD). CAPT ELECTED NOT TO SUMMON MAINT UNTIL RETURN TO ZZZ, WHICH I CONCURRED WITH DUE TO APPARENT MINOR NATURE OF PROB AND EARLIER MAINT INSPECTION. IN RETROSPECT, HOWEVER, WE SHOULD HAVE SUMMONED (CONTRACT) MAINT IN XXX (AN OUTSTATION). CLRLY THE NOISE STILL EXISTED. PERHAPS NOT A BIG DEAL, PERHAPS A SIGN OF A BIGGER PROB. IF IT WAS IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO WRITE UP, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE NO MATTER WHAT OUR LOCATION. WE WERE RUNNING LATE, NO DOUBT THAT TIME PRESSURE AND OUR DESIRE TO RETURN TO BASE HAD SOME AFFECT ON OUR DECISION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.