Narrative:

After takeoff the nose landing gear would not fully retract. The captain elected not to cycle the gear because of slipstream noise and a temporary burning rubber odor. We had the gear examined by air rescue fire fighting (arff) during a low pass. It appeared to them that the right nose tire was shredded. Arff looked closely at the gear after landing and could see no damage so we taxied to the gate with their escort. Company maintenance found the strut was deflated without apparent fluid leakage. The preflight strut extension wasn't very high, but seemed to be within operating manual limits. I thought the strut was under a load.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN MD82, IMMEDIATELY AFTER TKOF, RETURNED TO THE FIELD DUE TO UNABLE TO RETRACT THE NOSE LNDG GEAR CAUSED BY A DEFLATED STRUT.

Narrative: AFTER TKOF THE NOSE LNDG GEAR WOULD NOT FULLY RETRACT. THE CAPT ELECTED NOT TO CYCLE THE GEAR BECAUSE OF SLIPSTREAM NOISE AND A TEMPORARY BURNING RUBBER ODOR. WE HAD THE GEAR EXAMINED BY AIR RESCUE FIRE FIGHTING (ARFF) DURING A LOW PASS. IT APPEARED TO THEM THAT THE R NOSE TIRE WAS SHREDDED. ARFF LOOKED CLOSELY AT THE GEAR AFTER LNDG AND COULD SEE NO DAMAGE SO WE TAXIED TO THE GATE WITH THEIR ESCORT. COMPANY MAINT FOUND THE STRUT WAS DEFLATED WITHOUT APPARENT FLUID LEAKAGE. THE PREFLT STRUT EXTENSION WASN'T VERY HIGH, BUT SEEMED TO BE WITHIN OPERATING MANUAL LIMITS. I THOUGHT THE STRUT WAS UNDER A LOAD.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.