Narrative:

Tul approach runs opposite direction VFR practice approachs at rvs when rvs is in a south flow. Tul is responsible for separation (radar) with rvs's automatically released IFR departures. The IFR cessna departed rvs and was head-on with the VFR on the practice approach. Neither aircraft responded to the 2 ATC facilities until they were approximately 3 mi apart (head-on). At that time, the rvs controller canceled the approach clearance of the VFR and instructed him to enter a downwind (saving an operational error). The event is one of many occurrences of this exact type at this exact location.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: APCH CTLR COMPLAINT OF ATC PROC FOR PERMITTING PRACTICE ILS APCH WHEN WIND CONDITIONS CAUSE OPPOSITE DIRECTION DEPS, RESULTING IN 'HEAD-ON' CONFLICTION 3 MI FROM ARPT.

Narrative: TUL APCH RUNS OPPOSITE DIRECTION VFR PRACTICE APCHS AT RVS WHEN RVS IS IN A S FLOW. TUL IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SEPARATION (RADAR) WITH RVS'S AUTOMATICALLY RELEASED IFR DEPS. THE IFR CESSNA DEPARTED RVS AND WAS HEAD-ON WITH THE VFR ON THE PRACTICE APCH. NEITHER ACFT RESPONDED TO THE 2 ATC FACILITIES UNTIL THEY WERE APPROX 3 MI APART (HEAD-ON). AT THAT TIME, THE RVS CTLR CANCELED THE APCH CLRNC OF THE VFR AND INSTRUCTED HIM TO ENTER A DOWNWIND (SAVING AN OPERROR). THE EVENT IS ONE OF MANY OCCURRENCES OF THIS EXACT TYPE AT THIS EXACT LOCATION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.