Narrative:

Level at FL350. ATC said, 'air carrier X, descend and maintain FL310.' captain responded, 'air carrier X, out of FL350 for FL310.' while descending, ATC said, 'air carrier X say your altitude.' captain responded, 'air carrier X passing FL325 for FL310.' ATC said we were not given a clearance to FL310. Then ATC said 'air carrier X descend and maintain FL310.' captain said 'air carrier X descending to FL310.' possibly one or more of many reasons. 1) possibly, ATC 'meant clearance' for another aircraft, but verbally said our call sign. 2) possibly, ATC actually gave clearance to another aircraft, and the captain incorrectly read back the clearance, thinking it was for his aircraft. If this was the case, then ATC failed to notice an incorrect 'call sign' reading back his clearance, that was intended for a different aircraft. If ATC used incorrect call sign, (for a clearance meant for a different aircraft), ATC should double-check for correct call sign usage. Also, upon crew member reading back a clearance to ATC, listen closely for correct call sign reading back clearance. For crew: listen very closely for whom a clearance is intended. Contributing factors: the captain did not 'question' ATC's clearance, because the time/position was normal for such a descent. Also, the first officer did not question the clearance, or the readback, either.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B757 FLC LEAVES THEIR PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED ALT OF FL350 WHEN THEY POSSIBLY ANSWER TO A WRONG CALL SIGN FOR A LOWER ALT NEAR AND, SC.

Narrative: LEVEL AT FL350. ATC SAID, 'ACR X, DSND AND MAINTAIN FL310.' CAPT RESPONDED, 'ACR X, OUT OF FL350 FOR FL310.' WHILE DSNDING, ATC SAID, 'ACR X SAY YOUR ALT.' CAPT RESPONDED, 'ACR X PASSING FL325 FOR FL310.' ATC SAID WE WERE NOT GIVEN A CLRNC TO FL310. THEN ATC SAID 'ACR X DSND AND MAINTAIN FL310.' CAPT SAID 'ACR X DSNDING TO FL310.' POSSIBLY ONE OR MORE OF MANY REASONS. 1) POSSIBLY, ATC 'MEANT CLRNC' FOR ANOTHER ACFT, BUT VERBALLY SAID OUR CALL SIGN. 2) POSSIBLY, ATC ACTUALLY GAVE CLRNC TO ANOTHER ACFT, AND THE CAPT INCORRECTLY READ BACK THE CLRNC, THINKING IT WAS FOR HIS ACFT. IF THIS WAS THE CASE, THEN ATC FAILED TO NOTICE AN INCORRECT 'CALL SIGN' READING BACK HIS CLRNC, THAT WAS INTENDED FOR A DIFFERENT ACFT. IF ATC USED INCORRECT CALL SIGN, (FOR A CLRNC MEANT FOR A DIFFERENT ACFT), ATC SHOULD DOUBLE-CHK FOR CORRECT CALL SIGN USAGE. ALSO, UPON CREW MEMBER READING BACK A CLRNC TO ATC, LISTEN CLOSELY FOR CORRECT CALL SIGN READING BACK CLRNC. FOR CREW: LISTEN VERY CLOSELY FOR WHOM A CLRNC IS INTENDED. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: THE CAPT DID NOT 'QUESTION' ATC'S CLRNC, BECAUSE THE TIME/POS WAS NORMAL FOR SUCH A DSCNT. ALSO, THE FO DID NOT QUESTION THE CLRNC, OR THE READBACK, EITHER.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.