Narrative:

Aircraft xyz arrived ZZZ with #3 engine aft blowout panel loose. The engine was open and inspected for damage. All pneumatic duct and valves were operated and #3 engine was ran at high power for leak check. After the run, everything checked good. The loose blowout panel was removed, straightened, reinstalled and secured. I was under the assumption that my recertification action was airworthy, but as a precautionary follow-up, I incorrectly xferred this item to the open item list. This fact did not affect aircraft xyz airworthiness, but did violate the MEL/oil established procedures.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A DC10-30F HAD #3 ENG COWLING AFT BLOWOUT DOOR DISCOVERED OPEN. ENG PNEUMATIC SYS LEAK CHKED AND DOOR REPAIRED BUT RPT NOT CLRED WITH ABOVE ACTION BUT DEFERRED IN CONFLICT WITH THE MEL.

Narrative: ACFT XYZ ARRIVED ZZZ WITH #3 ENG AFT BLOWOUT PANEL LOOSE. THE ENG WAS OPEN AND INSPECTED FOR DAMAGE. ALL PNEUMATIC DUCT AND VALVES WERE OPERATED AND #3 ENG WAS RAN AT HIGH PWR FOR LEAK CHK. AFTER THE RUN, EVERYTHING CHKED GOOD. THE LOOSE BLOWOUT PANEL WAS REMOVED, STRAIGHTENED, REINSTALLED AND SECURED. I WAS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT MY RECERTIFICATION ACTION WAS AIRWORTHY, BUT AS A PRECAUTIONARY FOLLOW-UP, I INCORRECTLY XFERRED THIS ITEM TO THE OPEN ITEM LIST. THIS FACT DID NOT AFFECT ACFT XYZ AIRWORTHINESS, BUT DID VIOLATE THE MEL/OIL ESTABLISHED PROCS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.