Narrative:

I was working a feeder/arrival position. Air carrier X was established on the runway 31R final at 5000 ft. I noticed an aircraft (air carrier Y) descending through 5700 ft and converging. I issued traffic as conflict alert activated. The SF34 saw the MD80 off his left at less than 1 mi and descending. I instructed him to maintain visual and he elected to climb to avoid. I believe the MD80 did not follow control instructions which caused the near midair collision. Also, conflict alert may not have activated quickly enough. A situation on AR1 position may have distraction the controller in charge of air carrier Y causing him to miss the fact that air carrier Y had not taken the turn. Neither pilot apparently had TCASII alerts. Air carrier X did not mention TCASII or RA.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: D10 CTLR RECOGNIZES CONFLICTING EVENT BTWN SF34, UNDER HIS CTL, AND AN MD80 TRACKING THROUGH THE ADJOINING FINAL APCH COURSE ON ANOTHER D10 CTLR'S FREQ.

Narrative: I WAS WORKING A FEEDER/ARR POS. ACR X WAS ESTABLISHED ON THE RWY 31R FINAL AT 5000 FT. I NOTICED AN ACFT (ACR Y) DSNDING THROUGH 5700 FT AND CONVERGING. I ISSUED TFC AS CONFLICT ALERT ACTIVATED. THE SF34 SAW THE MD80 OFF HIS L AT LESS THAN 1 MI AND DSNDING. I INSTRUCTED HIM TO MAINTAIN VISUAL AND HE ELECTED TO CLB TO AVOID. I BELIEVE THE MD80 DID NOT FOLLOW CTL INSTRUCTIONS WHICH CAUSED THE NMAC. ALSO, CONFLICT ALERT MAY NOT HAVE ACTIVATED QUICKLY ENOUGH. A SIT ON AR1 POS MAY HAVE DISTR THE CTLR IN CHARGE OF ACR Y CAUSING HIM TO MISS THE FACT THAT ACR Y HAD NOT TAKEN THE TURN. NEITHER PLT APPARENTLY HAD TCASII ALERTS. ACR X DID NOT MENTION TCASII OR RA.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.