Narrative:

We flew an ILS approach to runway 7 at cyow and landed with less than required visibility. We were cleared for ILS approach. WX was 300 ft overcast, visibility 1 3/4 mi, RVR 3000 ft. Approach control stated ceiling 200 ft overcast, visibility 1 1/4 mi, RVR 2000 ft, lights stage 5, cleared to land. The captain rogered the call and we continued approach. Tower once again stated the same WX, 200 ft overcast, visibility 1 1/4 mi, RVR 2000 ft, cleared to land. In our operations manual there is a chart for operations in canadian airspace on how to convert metric to RVR and united states visibility. We figured converted RVR from 2000 meters would be about 1 1/4 mi, which agreed with tower report of visibility in mi. Upon landing we mentioned visibility seemed a lot less than 1 1/4 mi. We discussed this and concluded that RVR was wrong, turns out to be our error.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A DORNIER 328 FLC LANDED BELOW MINIMUMS AT CYOW.

Narrative: WE FLEW AN ILS APCH TO RWY 7 AT CYOW AND LANDED WITH LESS THAN REQUIRED VISIBILITY. WE WERE CLRED FOR ILS APCH. WX WAS 300 FT OVCST, VISIBILITY 1 3/4 MI, RVR 3000 FT. APCH CTL STATED CEILING 200 FT OVCST, VISIBILITY 1 1/4 MI, RVR 2000 FT, LIGHTS STAGE 5, CLRED TO LAND. THE CAPT ROGERED THE CALL AND WE CONTINUED APCH. TWR ONCE AGAIN STATED THE SAME WX, 200 FT OVCST, VISIBILITY 1 1/4 MI, RVR 2000 FT, CLRED TO LAND. IN OUR OPS MANUAL THERE IS A CHART FOR OPS IN CANADIAN AIRSPACE ON HOW TO CONVERT METRIC TO RVR AND UNITED STATES VISIBILITY. WE FIGURED CONVERTED RVR FROM 2000 METERS WOULD BE ABOUT 1 1/4 MI, WHICH AGREED WITH TWR RPT OF VISIBILITY IN MI. UPON LNDG WE MENTIONED VISIBILITY SEEMED A LOT LESS THAN 1 1/4 MI. WE DISCUSSED THIS AND CONCLUDED THAT RVR WAS WRONG, TURNS OUT TO BE OUR ERROR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.