Narrative:

Air carrier flight crew 123 ams to iad. Given rerte across atlantic to ydp versus porgy. New release indicated one route versus another. New route inserted in CDU. Clearance given to mt and confirmed mt direct after ydp. Approaching mt, montreal questioned position, expecting aircraft at mofat (20 NM away). Relayed clearance to mt. Montreal says, 'no problem,' but would contact gander. Gander says, 'cleared ydp to mofat.' no further comment. Flight continued uneventfully, no problems. Dispatch notified. The problem is we read back 'mt' but gander did not confirm 'mt,' only read initial clearance which we thought was 'mt.' should have asked for full clearance readback and gander should have given full clearance and problem would have been solved since route #N306C goes only to mofat versus route #N352C to mt. Contributing factors to this problem included the quality of transmission, language differences, quality of reception, hearing, readback, and verification. Clrncs after rertes or any time should include full route disclosure and readback with verification by controller. Rertes, unlike normal flight plans, should include more detail for all involves. All parties should be proactive in obtaining details for new clrncs.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B777 INTL FLC RECEIVED A RERTE ACROSS THE ATLANTIC. MONTREAL EXPECTED THE ACFT TO BE AT MOFAT, BUT THE CREW HEARD THEY WERE CLRED DIRECT MT. GANDER CLRED THEM TO MOFAT AND NO FURTHER COMMENTS WERE MADE.

Narrative: ACR FLC 123 AMS TO IAD. GIVEN RERTE ACROSS ATLANTIC TO YDP VERSUS PORGY. NEW RELEASE INDICATED ONE RTE VERSUS ANOTHER. NEW RTE INSERTED IN CDU. CLRNC GIVEN TO MT AND CONFIRMED MT DIRECT AFTER YDP. APCHING MT, MONTREAL QUESTIONED POS, EXPECTING ACFT AT MOFAT (20 NM AWAY). RELAYED CLRNC TO MT. MONTREAL SAYS, 'NO PROB,' BUT WOULD CONTACT GANDER. GANDER SAYS, 'CLRED YDP TO MOFAT.' NO FURTHER COMMENT. FLT CONTINUED UNEVENTFULLY, NO PROBS. DISPATCH NOTIFIED. THE PROB IS WE READ BACK 'MT' BUT GANDER DID NOT CONFIRM 'MT,' ONLY READ INITIAL CLRNC WHICH WE THOUGHT WAS 'MT.' SHOULD HAVE ASKED FOR FULL CLRNC READBACK AND GANDER SHOULD HAVE GIVEN FULL CLRNC AND PROB WOULD HAVE BEEN SOLVED SINCE RTE #N306C GOES ONLY TO MOFAT VERSUS RTE #N352C TO MT. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO THIS PROB INCLUDED THE QUALITY OF XMISSION, LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES, QUALITY OF RECEPTION, HEARING, READBACK, AND VERIFICATION. CLRNCS AFTER RERTES OR ANY TIME SHOULD INCLUDE FULL RTE DISCLOSURE AND READBACK WITH VERIFICATION BY CTLR. RERTES, UNLIKE NORMAL FLT PLANS, SHOULD INCLUDE MORE DETAIL FOR ALL INVOLVES. ALL PARTIES SHOULD BE PROACTIVE IN OBTAINING DETAILS FOR NEW CLRNCS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.