Narrative:

After gear retraction, stl tower advised us we might have lost a nosewheel. Gear retraction was normal with no unusual vibration and the hydraulic system appeared normal. I elected to continue to destination, mco. Runway length, width, and no strong xwinds at mco were factors for continuing to destination along with the fact that we would be able to burn off fuel to reduce our landing weight. The nose gear was observed by mco maintenance during a low approach and confirmed a nosewheel was in fact missing. The subsequent landing was normal and the aircraft rolled almost to the end of runway 18L and stopped. Flight xyz was then towed from the runway to the gate.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B757-200 ON TKOF ROLL HAD A NOSE GEAR WHEEL AND TIRE ASSEMBLY DEPART THE ACFT.

Narrative: AFTER GEAR RETRACTION, STL TWR ADVISED US WE MIGHT HAVE LOST A NOSEWHEEL. GEAR RETRACTION WAS NORMAL WITH NO UNUSUAL VIBRATION AND THE HYD SYS APPEARED NORMAL. I ELECTED TO CONTINUE TO DEST, MCO. RWY LENGTH, WIDTH, AND NO STRONG XWINDS AT MCO WERE FACTORS FOR CONTINUING TO DEST ALONG WITH THE FACT THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO BURN OFF FUEL TO REDUCE OUR LNDG WT. THE NOSE GEAR WAS OBSERVED BY MCO MAINT DURING A LOW APCH AND CONFIRMED A NOSEWHEEL WAS IN FACT MISSING. THE SUBSEQUENT LNDG WAS NORMAL AND THE ACFT ROLLED ALMOST TO THE END OF RWY 18L AND STOPPED. FLT XYZ WAS THEN TOWED FROM THE RWY TO THE GATE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.