Narrative:

I was dispatcher at air carrier ab atl-nrt. 13 hours 17 mins time en route via northern canada, alaska, russian, far east. 2 full crew (2 captain, 2 first officer). At XX16Z (about 4 1/2 hours into flight) I was advised by ACARS (data link) that relief crew got no rest on break, that crew was unfit, and requested flight plan calho (next fix) to pdx. I responded via ACARS, requesting details and for voice contact either via satcom or HF. Crew called at XX43Z advising that they were proceeding to pdx for crew change and that it was unsafe to continue and they had already obtained clearance to do so. I advised captain that based on his declaration of unsafe to continue and his decision to divert without consultation with dispatcher, considering that I had no opportunity to evaluate proposed route, destination, and alternate, including appropriate NOTAMS, that I considered that he was proceeding under his emergency authority/authorized. During the period between XX16Z and XX43Z, I also considered the possibility of a security threat due to lack of further information. I felt that the crew may be acting under duress. I made the appropriate coded inquiry and received an appropriate response indicating no threat existed.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MD11 CREW DIVERTED WHEN INTL RELIEF CREW WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN PROPER REST.

Narrative: I WAS DISPATCHER AT ACR AB ATL-NRT. 13 HRS 17 MINS TIME ENRTE VIA NORTHERN CANADA, ALASKA, RUSSIAN, FAR EAST. 2 FULL CREW (2 CAPT, 2 FO). AT XX16Z (ABOUT 4 1/2 HRS INTO FLT) I WAS ADVISED BY ACARS (DATA LINK) THAT RELIEF CREW GOT NO REST ON BREAK, THAT CREW WAS UNFIT, AND REQUESTED FLT PLAN CALHO (NEXT FIX) TO PDX. I RESPONDED VIA ACARS, REQUESTING DETAILS AND FOR VOICE CONTACT EITHER VIA SATCOM OR HF. CREW CALLED AT XX43Z ADVISING THAT THEY WERE PROCEEDING TO PDX FOR CREW CHANGE AND THAT IT WAS UNSAFE TO CONTINUE AND THEY HAD ALREADY OBTAINED CLRNC TO DO SO. I ADVISED CAPT THAT BASED ON HIS DECLARATION OF UNSAFE TO CONTINUE AND HIS DECISION TO DIVERT WITHOUT CONSULTATION WITH DISPATCHER, CONSIDERING THAT I HAD NO OPPORTUNITY TO EVALUATE PROPOSED RTE, DEST, AND ALTERNATE, INCLUDING APPROPRIATE NOTAMS, THAT I CONSIDERED THAT HE WAS PROCEEDING UNDER HIS EMER AUTH. DURING THE PERIOD BTWN XX16Z AND XX43Z, I ALSO CONSIDERED THE POSSIBILITY OF A SECURITY THREAT DUE TO LACK OF FURTHER INFO. I FELT THAT THE CREW MAY BE ACTING UNDER DURESS. I MADE THE APPROPRIATE CODED INQUIRY AND RECEIVED AN APPROPRIATE RESPONSE INDICATING NO THREAT EXISTED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.