Narrative:

I was assigned a reduced duty day which I accepted. The next day the company informed me that I had not been legal to accept the day in question. Upon review of the aircraft logbook, I determined that I had totaled my flight time incorrectly 2 days prior to the occurrence. As a result, I accepted a duty day which was more than 1 hour more than I could legally accept. This could have been prevented in 2 ways: 1) the company could have assigned crew member a legal day as per their records, or 2) discussed the situation with the crew member.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FO OF AN ACR LTT TURBOPROP EXCEEDED FLT DUTY TIME IN A 7 DAY PERIOD BY OVER 1 HR. COMPANY ASSIGNED FO AND THEN THE NEXT DAY INFORMED HIM THAT THE FLT RECORDS SHOWED THAT HE HAD GONE OVER.

Narrative: I WAS ASSIGNED A REDUCED DUTY DAY WHICH I ACCEPTED. THE NEXT DAY THE COMPANY INFORMED ME THAT I HAD NOT BEEN LEGAL TO ACCEPT THE DAY IN QUESTION. UPON REVIEW OF THE ACFT LOGBOOK, I DETERMINED THAT I HAD TOTALED MY FLT TIME INCORRECTLY 2 DAYS PRIOR TO THE OCCURRENCE. AS A RESULT, I ACCEPTED A DUTY DAY WHICH WAS MORE THAN 1 HR MORE THAN I COULD LEGALLY ACCEPT. THIS COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED IN 2 WAYS: 1) THE COMPANY COULD HAVE ASSIGNED CREW MEMBER A LEGAL DAY AS PER THEIR RECORDS, OR 2) DISCUSSED THE SIT WITH THE CREW MEMBER.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.