Narrative:

A takeoff on runway 1R was briefed with gapp departure (heading 350 degrees). Runway was changed to runway 28L due to weight and tailwind conditions, negating the previously briefed departure for runway 1R. I did not catch the straight out departure at takeoff brief, due to other concerns, we turned toward heading 350 degrees instead of 281 degree radial. Controller mentioned it and we immediately turned back. No mention of conflict with other aircraft was made. Supplemental information from acn 402203: on taxi out we should have consulted the SID for the new runway and rebriefed it. Instead, we turned to 350 degrees after takeoff instead of intercepting the 281 degree radial. This could have caused a loss of separation for aircraft departing on runway 1R. Always rebrief departure on runway changes.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN L1011 FLC FAILS TO REVIEW THEIR DEP PROC FOR SFO RWY 28L AFTER HAVING BRIEFED FOR A RWY 1R DEP PROC. THEY START THE TURN TO 350 DEGS AS PER THE RWY 1R DEP PROC. DEP CTLR CATCHES ERROR.

Narrative: A TKOF ON RWY 1R WAS BRIEFED WITH GAPP DEP (HDG 350 DEGS). RWY WAS CHANGED TO RWY 28L DUE TO WT AND TAILWIND CONDITIONS, NEGATING THE PREVIOUSLY BRIEFED DEP FOR RWY 1R. I DID NOT CATCH THE STRAIGHT OUT DEP AT TKOF BRIEF, DUE TO OTHER CONCERNS, WE TURNED TOWARD HDG 350 DEGS INSTEAD OF 281 DEG RADIAL. CTLR MENTIONED IT AND WE IMMEDIATELY TURNED BACK. NO MENTION OF CONFLICT WITH OTHER ACFT WAS MADE. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 402203: ON TAXI OUT WE SHOULD HAVE CONSULTED THE SID FOR THE NEW RWY AND REBRIEFED IT. INSTEAD, WE TURNED TO 350 DEGS AFTER TKOF INSTEAD OF INTERCEPTING THE 281 DEG RADIAL. THIS COULD HAVE CAUSED A LOSS OF SEPARATION FOR ACFT DEPARTING ON RWY 1R. ALWAYS REBRIEF DEP ON RWY CHANGES.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.