Narrative:

I departed jfk on the jfk 7 departure, but shortly after takeoff I was issued vectors. I had just passed 10000 ft and was increasing airspeed from 260 KTS to 335 KTS, when on assigned heading of 010 degrees. Departure said there was traffic at 10 O'clock and 10500 ft. ATC then said turn to 080 degrees. This seemed wrong to me (ie, it would cause me to turn into the VFR traffic at 10 O'clock) and I asked the copilot to confirm the 080 degree heading. ATC replied, 'yes, turn to 080 degrees and increase rate of climb.' I started to turn to 080 degrees when I received a TA and noticed the traffic on TCASII approaching from the right at 00 altitude. TCASII then gave an RA (climb) and I stopped the turn and pitched up to comply with TCASII RA. The so added go around power and I had to reduce the pitch attitude as airspeed was rapidly approaching my vzf of 256 KTS. As the target approached my position on TCASII, ATC said turn to 340 degrees and I saw the traffic on TCASII slide under us at -100. I feel that ATC should never have turned us toward the VFR traffic (they said they tried to turn us behind the VFR traffic), but should have leveled us off at 10000 ft, or had us descend. We were fairly heavy at 750000 pounds and not very maneuverable, as our vzf was 256 KTS. We never saw the traffic, and my near miss declaration is based on TCASII only.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NEAR MISS RPTED BTWN CLBING ACR B747 AND UNKNOWN VFR AT 10500 FT.

Narrative: I DEPARTED JFK ON THE JFK 7 DEP, BUT SHORTLY AFTER TKOF I WAS ISSUED VECTORS. I HAD JUST PASSED 10000 FT AND WAS INCREASING AIRSPD FROM 260 KTS TO 335 KTS, WHEN ON ASSIGNED HDG OF 010 DEGS. DEP SAID THERE WAS TFC AT 10 O'CLOCK AND 10500 FT. ATC THEN SAID TURN TO 080 DEGS. THIS SEEMED WRONG TO ME (IE, IT WOULD CAUSE ME TO TURN INTO THE VFR TFC AT 10 O'CLOCK) AND I ASKED THE COPLT TO CONFIRM THE 080 DEG HDG. ATC REPLIED, 'YES, TURN TO 080 DEGS AND INCREASE RATE OF CLB.' I STARTED TO TURN TO 080 DEGS WHEN I RECEIVED A TA AND NOTICED THE TFC ON TCASII APCHING FROM THE R AT 00 ALT. TCASII THEN GAVE AN RA (CLB) AND I STOPPED THE TURN AND PITCHED UP TO COMPLY WITH TCASII RA. THE SO ADDED GAR PWR AND I HAD TO REDUCE THE PITCH ATTITUDE AS AIRSPD WAS RAPIDLY APCHING MY VZF OF 256 KTS. AS THE TARGET APCHED MY POS ON TCASII, ATC SAID TURN TO 340 DEGS AND I SAW THE TFC ON TCASII SLIDE UNDER US AT -100. I FEEL THAT ATC SHOULD NEVER HAVE TURNED US TOWARD THE VFR TFC (THEY SAID THEY TRIED TO TURN US BEHIND THE VFR TFC), BUT SHOULD HAVE LEVELED US OFF AT 10000 FT, OR HAD US DSND. WE WERE FAIRLY HVY AT 750000 LBS AND NOT VERY MANEUVERABLE, AS OUR VZF WAS 256 KTS. WE NEVER SAW THE TFC, AND MY NEAR MISS DECLARATION IS BASED ON TCASII ONLY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.