Narrative:

While assigned to a 48 month inspection on a hawker 600, I encountered a work stoppage for parts and to facilitate other maintenance. While at this work stoppage, I was assigned to assist on a 'C' check inspection on a falcon 10 serial XXXX, card code xyz. Later that morning, hawker parts and equipment came in which required that I return to the 48 month inspection on the hawker 600. I bagged and tagged all hardware, probes, electrical boxes, and panels. All removed parts and panels were stored, and the technician was given a complete turnover as to what had been done, my stopping point, and why I was stopping. Days later, I was asked to re-install the probes and electrical boxes. I was assured that the operation had been completed and inspected. In good faith, I re-installed the probes and electrical boxes and signed off the card. On sep/xa/97 I was informed that some small corrosion was discovered in the feeder tank during another inspection at a different location. I traveled to the location and inspected the feeder tank and verified a small spot of corrosion existed on the forward l-hand corner of the right feeder tank. From this occurrence I've learned that good faith and assurances have their place, but not in aircraft maintenance. I've always double-checked all maintenance and completed all tasks assigned. I will continue to double-check my work and not be assured or assume anything unless I've personally checked and verified the maintenance myself.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A FALCON 10C WAS DISPATCHED WITH THE FUSELAGE FUEL FEEDER TANK IMPROPER REPAIRED.

Narrative: WHILE ASSIGNED TO A 48 MONTH INSPECTION ON A HAWKER 600, I ENCOUNTERED A WORK STOPPAGE FOR PARTS AND TO FACILITATE OTHER MAINT. WHILE AT THIS WORK STOPPAGE, I WAS ASSIGNED TO ASSIST ON A 'C' CHK INSPECTION ON A FALCON 10 SERIAL XXXX, CARD CODE XYZ. LATER THAT MORNING, HAWKER PARTS AND EQUIP CAME IN WHICH REQUIRED THAT I RETURN TO THE 48 MONTH INSPECTION ON THE HAWKER 600. I BAGGED AND TAGGED ALL HARDWARE, PROBES, ELECTRICAL BOXES, AND PANELS. ALL REMOVED PARTS AND PANELS WERE STORED, AND THE TECHNICIAN WAS GIVEN A COMPLETE TURNOVER AS TO WHAT HAD BEEN DONE, MY STOPPING POINT, AND WHY I WAS STOPPING. DAYS LATER, I WAS ASKED TO RE-INSTALL THE PROBES AND ELECTRICAL BOXES. I WAS ASSURED THAT THE OP HAD BEEN COMPLETED AND INSPECTED. IN GOOD FAITH, I RE-INSTALLED THE PROBES AND ELECTRICAL BOXES AND SIGNED OFF THE CARD. ON SEP/XA/97 I WAS INFORMED THAT SOME SMALL CORROSION WAS DISCOVERED IN THE FEEDER TANK DURING ANOTHER INSPECTION AT A DIFFERENT LOCATION. I TRAVELED TO THE LOCATION AND INSPECTED THE FEEDER TANK AND VERIFIED A SMALL SPOT OF CORROSION EXISTED ON THE FORWARD L-HAND CORNER OF THE R FEEDER TANK. FROM THIS OCCURRENCE I'VE LEARNED THAT GOOD FAITH AND ASSURANCES HAVE THEIR PLACE, BUT NOT IN ACFT MAINT. I'VE ALWAYS DOUBLE-CHKED ALL MAINT AND COMPLETED ALL TASKS ASSIGNED. I WILL CONTINUE TO DOUBLE-CHK MY WORK AND NOT BE ASSURED OR ASSUME ANYTHING UNLESS I'VE PERSONALLY CHKED AND VERIFIED THE MAINT MYSELF.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.