Narrative:

The fdc NOTAM file contains many NOTAMS that are absurdly out of date. Since these NOTAMS cover important directives (MEA's, map's, MDA's, etc) and take precedence over charts and approach procedures, they must be canceled when appropriate. If we can't trust them to be accurate, why bother checking them? The issuing authority/authorized should provide an expected termination date and that date could be used for automatic cancellation. That date should be provided with the NOTAM. (Stupid descriptors like 'until canceled,' would not be acceptable.) FSS computers only hold the NOTAMS for about 1 yr but the duats faithfully brief you with all the current NOTAMS. This lapse is an important safety issue. It needs to be fixed.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PLT RPT ON THE FDC NOTAM FILES AND HOW OUT OF DATE THEY ARE PLUS THE LAPSE BTWN FSS COMPUTER INFO AND DUATS NOTAMS.

Narrative: THE FDC NOTAM FILE CONTAINS MANY NOTAMS THAT ARE ABSURDLY OUT OF DATE. SINCE THESE NOTAMS COVER IMPORTANT DIRECTIVES (MEA'S, MAP'S, MDA'S, ETC) AND TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER CHARTS AND APCH PROCS, THEY MUST BE CANCELED WHEN APPROPRIATE. IF WE CAN'T TRUST THEM TO BE ACCURATE, WHY BOTHER CHKING THEM? THE ISSUING AUTH SHOULD PROVIDE AN EXPECTED TERMINATION DATE AND THAT DATE COULD BE USED FOR AUTOMATIC CANCELLATION. THAT DATE SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH THE NOTAM. (STUPID DESCRIPTORS LIKE 'UNTIL CANCELED,' WOULD NOT BE ACCEPTABLE.) FSS COMPUTERS ONLY HOLD THE NOTAMS FOR ABOUT 1 YR BUT THE DUATS FAITHFULLY BRIEF YOU WITH ALL THE CURRENT NOTAMS. THIS LAPSE IS AN IMPORTANT SAFETY ISSUE. IT NEEDS TO BE FIXED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.