![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 353260 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 199611 | 
| Day | Tue | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | atc facility : rdu airport : rdw  | 
| State Reference | NC | 
| Altitude | msl bound lower : 6000 msl bound upper : 6000  | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Night | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : rdw | 
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier | 
| Make Model Name | F28 Mk 1000 | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 | 
| Navigation In Use | Other | 
| Flight Phase | descent other | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Bonanza 35 | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 | 
| Flight Phase | descent other | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier | 
| Function | flight crew : first officer | 
| Qualification | pilot : atp | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 80 flight time total : 13500 flight time type : 4800  | 
| ASRS Report | 353260 | 
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier | 
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic  | 
| Qualification | pilot : atp | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe non adherence : far non adherence : clearance  | 
| Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified | 
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action | 
| Consequence | Other | 
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 2000 vertical : 700  | 
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance | 
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation | 
Narrative:
While descending into rdu, traffic was issued at 10 O'clock position low. We called traffic in sight and were then issued clearance to descend and maintain visual separation. I was busy trying to get a cockpit light to work as the captain made his descent. Seconds later we got a TA. As I looked up and saw a very fast closure rate I recommended the captain increase his rate of descent. We passed slightly behind and below the small aircraft. While safety was not compromised we were uncomfortably close. I feel the captain had problems judging his closure rate because of all the illumination from the city and the extreme differences in airspeed of the 2 aircraft. In the future I will not accept a visual descent at night under these conditions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FK28 PLT IS GIVEN TFC AND TOLD TO DSND MAINTAINING VISUAL ON THE TFC. FLC ACCEPTS AND THEN LOSES SIGHT OF THE BONANZA AND A CONFLICT RESULTS.
Narrative: WHILE DSNDING INTO RDU, TFC WAS ISSUED AT 10 O'CLOCK POS LOW. WE CALLED TFC IN SIGHT AND WERE THEN ISSUED CLRNC TO DSND AND MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION. I WAS BUSY TRYING TO GET A COCKPIT LIGHT TO WORK AS THE CAPT MADE HIS DSCNT. SECONDS LATER WE GOT A TA. AS I LOOKED UP AND SAW A VERY FAST CLOSURE RATE I RECOMMENDED THE CAPT INCREASE HIS RATE OF DSCNT. WE PASSED SLIGHTLY BEHIND AND BELOW THE SMALL ACFT. WHILE SAFETY WAS NOT COMPROMISED WE WERE UNCOMFORTABLY CLOSE. I FEEL THE CAPT HAD PROBS JUDGING HIS CLOSURE RATE BECAUSE OF ALL THE ILLUMINATION FROM THE CITY AND THE EXTREME DIFFERENCES IN AIRSPD OF THE 2 ACFT. IN THE FUTURE I WILL NOT ACCEPT A VISUAL DSCNT AT NIGHT UNDER THESE CONDITIONS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.