Narrative:

Received a radar plot from operations that we had not flown the appropriate SID. Upon further review we found that we had operated with an outdated SID. The new SID was issued on oct/xx/96 and put into aircraft specific mail boxes. At our departure date from home base there were no revisions found in our aircraft mail box, therefore we had the old outdated ones. Another issue is that some of these sids have you flying certain tracks that are not based on navaids but on dead reckoning, to compensate for wind drift by reading off the drift angle off the INS. This is a totally outdated method of navigation. We for sure need at least latitude and longitude from waypoint to waypoint that is not based on permanent navaids.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC DEV DURING DEP PROC IN FOREIGN AIRSPACE. MOST LIKELY A HDG TRACK POS DEV WHEN FLC UNKNOWINGLY REFERRED TO OUTDATED SID DEP CHARTS. FLC COMPLAINT OF NO CHARTS ISSUED BY COMPANY IN TIMELY FASHION. FURTHER COMPLAINT MADE REGARDING AERO CHART PRESENTATION NAV TECHNIQUES REGARDING POINT-TO-POINT NAV.

Narrative: RECEIVED A RADAR PLOT FROM OPS THAT WE HAD NOT FLOWN THE APPROPRIATE SID. UPON FURTHER REVIEW WE FOUND THAT WE HAD OPERATED WITH AN OUTDATED SID. THE NEW SID WAS ISSUED ON OCT/XX/96 AND PUT INTO ACFT SPECIFIC MAIL BOXES. AT OUR DEP DATE FROM HOME BASE THERE WERE NO REVISIONS FOUND IN OUR ACFT MAIL BOX, THEREFORE WE HAD THE OLD OUTDATED ONES. ANOTHER ISSUE IS THAT SOME OF THESE SIDS HAVE YOU FLYING CERTAIN TRACKS THAT ARE NOT BASED ON NAVAIDS BUT ON DEAD RECKONING, TO COMPENSATE FOR WIND DRIFT BY READING OFF THE DRIFT ANGLE OFF THE INS. THIS IS A TOTALLY OUTDATED METHOD OF NAV. WE FOR SURE NEED AT LEAST LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE FROM WAYPOINT TO WAYPOINT THAT IS NOT BASED ON PERMANENT NAVAIDS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.