Narrative:

On jul/xx/96, I was at the controls of flight from fwa to ord at around XX00 CST. Soon after takeoff from fwa, as we were climbing through 8000 ft to level off at 10000 ft, I heard the captain say something about his EFIS. I looked over to the left side and saw the EFIS flickering. A few moments later I smelled an electrical smoke, brought it to the attention of the captain and continued flying the airplane knowing that I was at the controls and that was my primary responsibility. After the left EFIS (pfd/nd) started providing clues of a malfunction, and after checking its output which was jumping between 100 volts and 150 volts well outside the normal range, the captain turned off the inverter #1. The captain also turned off the transformer rectifier unit #1 which seemed to stop the smell of an electrical smoke. The captain completed all the appropriate checklists. Given the circumstances, combined with the time and the WX conditions, we decided to declare an emergency and return back to fwa. At one point I tried to use the autoplt, but realized that it was inoperative. I had to hand-fly the airplane while the captain dealt with the 'emergency and abnormal checklist,' flight attendants and ATC. We were cleared for the ILS runway 23 approach and landing. We completed the landing without incident. Upon arrival the captain provided emergency personnel with the information they requested. The next day I called maintenance and was told by them that the problem was caused by the #1 inverter going bad. They explained that the inverter 'fried' on us, which is why we smelled electrical smoke and, it was 'draining a lot of juice' affecting the left side of the electrical system. In my opinion, there was nothing we could have done to prevent this from happening. I think we did a good job dealing with the situation. The only thing I wish we had done differently has to do with the level of communication between the pilots and the flight attendants during the emergency. I think we could have done a better job, even though happened relatively quickly. We were airborne for about 15 mins.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACFT EQUIP PROB. INVERTER FAILURE CAUSING EFIS FLICKERING, 100 TO 150 VOLTS (OUTSIDE NORMAL RANGE) AND SMOKE. THE FLC TURNED OFF THE #1 INVERTER AS WELL AS THE TRANSFORMER RECTIFIER UNIT. FLC DECLARED EMER, COMPLETED APPROPRIATE CHKLISTS AND RETURNED TO LAND UNEVENTFULLY. RPTR SAYS THAT THEY COULD HAVE HAD BETTER COM WITH THE FLT ATTENDANTS.

Narrative: ON JUL/XX/96, I WAS AT THE CTLS OF FLT FROM FWA TO ORD AT AROUND XX00 CST. SOON AFTER TKOF FROM FWA, AS WE WERE CLBING THROUGH 8000 FT TO LEVEL OFF AT 10000 FT, I HEARD THE CAPT SAY SOMETHING ABOUT HIS EFIS. I LOOKED OVER TO THE L SIDE AND SAW THE EFIS FLICKERING. A FEW MOMENTS LATER I SMELLED AN ELECTRICAL SMOKE, BROUGHT IT TO THE ATTN OF THE CAPT AND CONTINUED FLYING THE AIRPLANE KNOWING THAT I WAS AT THE CTLS AND THAT WAS MY PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY. AFTER THE L EFIS (PFD/ND) STARTED PROVIDING CLUES OF A MALFUNCTION, AND AFTER CHKING ITS OUTPUT WHICH WAS JUMPING BTWN 100 VOLTS AND 150 VOLTS WELL OUTSIDE THE NORMAL RANGE, THE CAPT TURNED OFF THE INVERTER #1. THE CAPT ALSO TURNED OFF THE TRANSFORMER RECTIFIER UNIT #1 WHICH SEEMED TO STOP THE SMELL OF AN ELECTRICAL SMOKE. THE CAPT COMPLETED ALL THE APPROPRIATE CHKLISTS. GIVEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, COMBINED WITH THE TIME AND THE WX CONDITIONS, WE DECIDED TO DECLARE AN EMER AND RETURN BACK TO FWA. AT ONE POINT I TRIED TO USE THE AUTOPLT, BUT REALIZED THAT IT WAS INOP. I HAD TO HAND-FLY THE AIRPLANE WHILE THE CAPT DEALT WITH THE 'EMER AND ABNORMAL CHKLIST,' FLT ATTENDANTS AND ATC. WE WERE CLRED FOR THE ILS RWY 23 APCH AND LNDG. WE COMPLETED THE LNDG WITHOUT INCIDENT. UPON ARR THE CAPT PROVIDED EMER PERSONNEL WITH THE INFO THEY REQUESTED. THE NEXT DAY I CALLED MAINT AND WAS TOLD BY THEM THAT THE PROB WAS CAUSED BY THE #1 INVERTER GOING BAD. THEY EXPLAINED THAT THE INVERTER 'FRIED' ON US, WHICH IS WHY WE SMELLED ELECTRICAL SMOKE AND, IT WAS 'DRAINING A LOT OF JUICE' AFFECTING THE L SIDE OF THE ELECTRICAL SYS. IN MY OPINION, THERE WAS NOTHING WE COULD HAVE DONE TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING. I THINK WE DID A GOOD JOB DEALING WITH THE SIT. THE ONLY THING I WISH WE HAD DONE DIFFERENTLY HAS TO DO WITH THE LEVEL OF COM BTWN THE PLTS AND THE FLT ATTENDANTS DURING THE EMER. I THINK WE COULD HAVE DONE A BETTER JOB, EVEN THOUGH HAPPENED RELATIVELY QUICKLY. WE WERE AIRBORNE FOR ABOUT 15 MINS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.