Narrative:

The captain's interpretation of the company operations manual was that certain seemingly required things on an approach could be substituted for by the use of other things, ie, identing fixes and intxns with the use of ATC radar, or gsia, etc. I disagreed. The approach was flown and ATC agreed it was fine and issued the approach clearance. The WX was just about VFR (3000 ft 2 1/2 mi) and the field was in sight. ATC identified a point that the captain had requested to confirm.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC DISAGREES AMONG THEMSELVES OVER LEGALITY OF IDENTING ILS FIXES WITH ALTERNATE MEANS.

Narrative: THE CAPT'S INTERPRETATION OF THE COMPANY OPS MANUAL WAS THAT CERTAIN SEEMINGLY REQUIRED THINGS ON AN APCH COULD BE SUBSTITUTED FOR BY THE USE OF OTHER THINGS, IE, IDENTING FIXES AND INTXNS WITH THE USE OF ATC RADAR, OR GSIA, ETC. I DISAGREED. THE APCH WAS FLOWN AND ATC AGREED IT WAS FINE AND ISSUED THE APCH CLRNC. THE WX WAS JUST ABOUT VFR (3000 FT 2 1/2 MI) AND THE FIELD WAS IN SIGHT. ATC IDENTIFIED A POINT THAT THE CAPT HAD REQUESTED TO CONFIRM.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.