Narrative:

We were cleared for takeoff on runway 18L at dfw with a 185 degree heading at the marker. After flaps up and climb power, we received an RA shortly after 1000 ft AGL. Target was less than 1 mi at 3 O'clock and 100 ft above. TCASII gave 1 'descend' and commanded massive (1200 ft plus) rate down. There never was another 'descend,' 'monitor vertical speed' or clear of conflict.' neither tower or departure had any traffic in our area at the time. Supplemental information from acn 310543: we never had visual contact and only had the 1 verbal command from TCASII. Departure control only had the wbound commuter on radar. Callback conversation with reporter from acn #310543 revealed the following information from 310543: the reporter was the non- flying captain on this trip. He has been so pleased with TCASII and its operation that he never considered the possibility of a false alarm. He now agrees that this could have been the situation as neither he, the flying first officer, nor ATC saw any other traffic. The WX was 'good,' he 'should have been able to see any traffic.' the TCASII was not written up in the logbook as the reporter did not consider a false alarm.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: POSSIBLE FALSE TCASII ALARM, POSSIBLE LTSS IN THE TFC PATTERN.

Narrative: WE WERE CLRED FOR TKOF ON RWY 18L AT DFW WITH A 185 DEG HDG AT THE MARKER. AFTER FLAPS UP AND CLB PWR, WE RECEIVED AN RA SHORTLY AFTER 1000 FT AGL. TARGET WAS LESS THAN 1 MI AT 3 O'CLOCK AND 100 FT ABOVE. TCASII GAVE 1 'DSND' AND COMMANDED MASSIVE (1200 FT PLUS) RATE DOWN. THERE NEVER WAS ANOTHER 'DSND,' 'MONITOR VERT SPD' OR CLR OF CONFLICT.' NEITHER TWR OR DEP HAD ANY TFC IN OUR AREA AT THE TIME. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 310543: WE NEVER HAD VISUAL CONTACT AND ONLY HAD THE 1 VERBAL COMMAND FROM TCASII. DEP CTL ONLY HAD THE WBOUND COMMUTER ON RADAR. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR FROM ACN #310543 REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO FROM 310543: THE RPTR WAS THE NON- FLYING CAPT ON THIS TRIP. HE HAS BEEN SO PLEASED WITH TCASII AND ITS OP THAT HE NEVER CONSIDERED THE POSSIBILITY OF A FALSE ALARM. HE NOW AGREES THAT THIS COULD HAVE BEEN THE SIT AS NEITHER HE, THE FLYING FO, NOR ATC SAW ANY OTHER TFC. THE WX WAS 'GOOD,' HE 'SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SEE ANY TFC.' THE TCASII WAS NOT WRITTEN UP IN THE LOGBOOK AS THE RPTR DID NOT CONSIDER A FALSE ALARM.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.