Narrative:

Air carrier X heading 200 degrees on a right downwind and cleared for the visual approach to runway 2L at nashville. Appropriate IRS frequency was selected for runway 2L. Approach and landing were made on runway 2C. We commented to each other that the GS was in error and continued visually (turned off ILS at that point.) I realized the mistake on landing rollout when I was looking for the T2 taxiway to turn off on and saw S5. Runway 2C extends out approximately 1 mi further to the south, I saw the right side and went right after the center runway. Had I looked at the 10-9 airport diagram more closely the problem was averted. Bna tower was called after arrival at the gate. He said they had no traffic so there was no problem. Supplemental information from acn 296420: ILS frequency for runway 2L was tuned and idented, both PF and myself thought it was unusual GS indicator showed the flight on GS and the VASI's showed the flight high on GS. The coarse displacement was not in either pilot's xchk on GS indicator. Upon touchdown and taxiing off the runway, was it discovered the flight had landed on runway 2C instead of runway 2L. As the PNF I would have hoped, since I consider ATC part of cockpit resource management, that tower would have noticed our discrepancy and informed the flight.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR X NON ADHERENCE TO ATC CLRNC LANDED WRONG RWY. RWY INCURSION.

Narrative: ACR X HEADING 200 DEGS ON A R DOWNWIND AND CLRED FOR THE VISUAL APCH TO RWY 2L AT NASHVILLE. APPROPRIATE IRS FREQ WAS SELECTED FOR RWY 2L. APCH AND LNDG WERE MADE ON RWY 2C. WE COMMENTED TO EACH OTHER THAT THE GS WAS IN ERROR AND CONTINUED VISUALLY (TURNED OFF ILS AT THAT POINT.) I REALIZED THE MISTAKE ON LNDG ROLLOUT WHEN I WAS LOOKING FOR THE T2 TXWY TO TURN OFF ON AND SAW S5. RWY 2C EXTENDS OUT APPROX 1 MI FURTHER TO THE S, I SAW THE R SIDE AND WENT R AFTER THE CTR RWY. HAD I LOOKED AT THE 10-9 ARPT DIAGRAM MORE CLOSELY THE PROB WAS AVERTED. BNA TWR WAS CALLED AFTER ARR AT THE GATE. HE SAID THEY HAD NO TFC SO THERE WAS NO PROB. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 296420: ILS FREQ FOR RWY 2L WAS TUNED AND IDENTED, BOTH PF AND MYSELF THOUGHT IT WAS UNUSUAL GS INDICATOR SHOWED THE FLT ON GS AND THE VASI'S SHOWED THE FLT HIGH ON GS. THE COARSE DISPLACEMENT WAS NOT IN EITHER PLT'S XCHK ON GS INDICATOR. UPON TOUCHDOWN AND TAXIING OFF THE RWY, WAS IT DISCOVERED THE FLT HAD LANDED ON RWY 2C INSTEAD OF RWY 2L. AS THE PNF I WOULD HAVE HOPED, SINCE I CONSIDER ATC PART OF COCKPIT RESOURCE MGMNT, THAT TWR WOULD HAVE NOTICED OUR DISCREPANCY AND INFORMED THE FLT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.