Narrative:

Flight from iad to ewr. I had not flown route before. Flight was held to 6000 ft for 40 mi. Never above 19000 ft in cruise and started down early. This caused higher than normal fuel consumption. Advised approach controller 'minimum fuel' with no emergency. Landed with 1 hour fuel left -- (our minimums). I received non standard approach for jet aircraft, (landed with turboprops). Typical jet approach would have taken up to 20 mins more. I felt this would not leave sufficient fuel reserves. I think I did the right thing. I believe this is what 'minimum fuel' advisory is for.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CORP ACFT DECLARED MINIMUM FUEL AND WAS LANDED WITH THE TURBOPROPS.

Narrative: FLT FROM IAD TO EWR. I HAD NOT FLOWN RTE BEFORE. FLT WAS HELD TO 6000 FT FOR 40 MI. NEVER ABOVE 19000 FT IN CRUISE AND STARTED DOWN EARLY. THIS CAUSED HIGHER THAN NORMAL FUEL CONSUMPTION. ADVISED APCH CTLR 'MINIMUM FUEL' WITH NO EMER. LANDED WITH 1 HR FUEL LEFT -- (OUR MINIMUMS). I RECEIVED NON STANDARD APCH FOR JET ACFT, (LANDED WITH TURBOPROPS). TYPICAL JET APCH WOULD HAVE TAKEN UP TO 20 MINS MORE. I FELT THIS WOULD NOT LEAVE SUFFICIENT FUEL RESERVES. I THINK I DID THE RIGHT THING. I BELIEVE THIS IS WHAT 'MINIMUM FUEL' ADVISORY IS FOR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.