Narrative:

After contacting new york approach, he called our sign, we entered the arsa at about 2000 ft and he assigned vector of 330 degrees. We turned and a min or 2 later, noticed another C172 approximately 400-500 ft to our port side at our altitude heading in the opposite direction. When noted, he was abeam our aircraft. No corrective action was taken as he'd passed us. About 40 seconds later, new york approach controller reported we had traffic that was 'no longer a factor.' my impression is alertness in our aircraft was reduced by the erroneous assumption that one need not be as vigilant as we were receiving radar vectors and any other aircraft would be kept a safe distance from our aircraft.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NMAC BTWN 2 C172 TYPE ACFT JUST INSIDE AN ARSA (CLASS C) AIRSPACE.

Narrative: AFTER CONTACTING NEW YORK APCH, HE CALLED OUR SIGN, WE ENTERED THE ARSA AT ABOUT 2000 FT AND HE ASSIGNED VECTOR OF 330 DEGS. WE TURNED AND A MIN OR 2 LATER, NOTICED ANOTHER C172 APPROX 400-500 FT TO OUR PORT SIDE AT OUR ALT HDG IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION. WHEN NOTED, HE WAS ABEAM OUR ACFT. NO CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS TAKEN AS HE'D PASSED US. ABOUT 40 SECONDS LATER, NEW YORK APCH CTLR RPTED WE HAD TFC THAT WAS 'NO LONGER A FACTOR.' MY IMPRESSION IS ALERTNESS IN OUR ACFT WAS REDUCED BY THE ERRONEOUS ASSUMPTION THAT ONE NEED NOT BE AS VIGILANT AS WE WERE RECEIVING RADAR VECTORS AND ANY OTHER ACFT WOULD BE KEPT A SAFE DISTANCE FROM OUR ACFT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.