Narrative:

Took off from romeo, mi, and spoke with selfridge approach then eastern michigan and into canada. I thought I needed a flight plan if landing. Didn't realize I needed one for overflt only. Actually, the concern came to mind half way through canadian airspace. It would help if this information was on VFR sectional and if information about ATC control above 12500 ft MSL was bolder. Also, it would maybe be nice to readily know what is canadian fir? Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter states he learned of the need for a flight plan from a FSDO seminar he attended. He then ordered a book on canadian regulations so he could familiarize himself with all information. He was in contact with approach until out of radar coverage then continued to destination. No requirement to be in contact if flight plan had been filed.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SMA PLT OVERFLYING CANADIAN AIRSPACE WITHOUT FILING FLT PLAN.

Narrative: TOOK OFF FROM ROMEO, MI, AND SPOKE WITH SELFRIDGE APCH THEN EASTERN MICHIGAN AND INTO CANADA. I THOUGHT I NEEDED A FLT PLAN IF LNDG. DIDN'T REALIZE I NEEDED ONE FOR OVERFLT ONLY. ACTUALLY, THE CONCERN CAME TO MIND HALF WAY THROUGH CANADIAN AIRSPACE. IT WOULD HELP IF THIS INFO WAS ON VFR SECTIONAL AND IF INFO ABOUT ATC CTL ABOVE 12500 FT MSL WAS BOLDER. ALSO, IT WOULD MAYBE BE NICE TO READILY KNOW WHAT IS CANADIAN FIR? CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATES HE LEARNED OF THE NEED FOR A FLT PLAN FROM A FSDO SEMINAR HE ATTENDED. HE THEN ORDERED A BOOK ON CANADIAN REGS SO HE COULD FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL INFO. HE WAS IN CONTACT WITH APCH UNTIL OUT OF RADAR COVERAGE THEN CONTINUED TO DEST. NO REQUIREMENT TO BE IN CONTACT IF FLT PLAN HAD BEEN FILED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.