Narrative:

I was working a combined radar approach/arrival position. Traffic was very light. Cpr X departed hpn runway 34 (runway 34 SID, maintain runway heading, 1000 ft, left heading, 295 degrees, maintain 3000 ft). Cpr Y check-in leaving 1700 ft (mode C). At same time I observed a mode C target northwest of hpn at 2400 ft nwbound. I radar idented cpr Y, issued traffic and a right turn, heading 340 degrees. Cpr X did not see aircraft Y. I checked with hpn tower, asked if cpr X at 2400 ft was on his frequency and tower advised 'yes' and that traffic was issued to cpr X. I then asked cpr X if in fact tower had issued the traffic at 2400 ft. The pilot said yes and that aircraft Y was on TCASII but he never did see aircraft Y. There was no conflict alert on my radar system. I did not ask cpr X if he received a TCASII RA. The shift supervisor called the hpn supervisor. Their feeling is 'that once traffic is issued, they have done their job' (my words). This has happened on a number of occasions either, 2 IFR aircraft depart, the second being faster, or a VFR will depart, not contact departure, then an IFR will depart and overtake the VFR. Hpn has no problem with the operation 'issue traffic, contact departure control.'

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CPR X TCASII TA WITH VFR ACFT Y. SEE AND AVOID CONCEPT.

Narrative: I WAS WORKING A COMBINED RADAR APCH/ARR POS. TFC WAS VERY LIGHT. CPR X DEPARTED HPN RWY 34 (RWY 34 SID, MAINTAIN RWY HDG, 1000 FT, L HDG, 295 DEGS, MAINTAIN 3000 FT). CPR Y CHK-IN LEAVING 1700 FT (MODE C). AT SAME TIME I OBSERVED A MODE C TARGET NW OF HPN AT 2400 FT NWBOUND. I RADAR IDENTED CPR Y, ISSUED TFC AND A R TURN, HDG 340 DEGS. CPR X DID NOT SEE ACFT Y. I CHKED WITH HPN TWR, ASKED IF CPR X AT 2400 FT WAS ON HIS FREQ AND TWR ADVISED 'YES' AND THAT TFC WAS ISSUED TO CPR X. I THEN ASKED CPR X IF IN FACT TWR HAD ISSUED THE TFC AT 2400 FT. THE PLT SAID YES AND THAT ACFT Y WAS ON TCASII BUT HE NEVER DID SEE ACFT Y. THERE WAS NO CONFLICT ALERT ON MY RADAR SYS. I DID NOT ASK CPR X IF HE RECEIVED A TCASII RA. THE SHIFT SUPVR CALLED THE HPN SUPVR. THEIR FEELING IS 'THAT ONCE TFC IS ISSUED, THEY HAVE DONE THEIR JOB' (MY WORDS). THIS HAS HAPPENED ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS EITHER, 2 IFR ACFT DEPART, THE SECOND BEING FASTER, OR A VFR WILL DEPART, NOT CONTACT DEP, THEN AN IFR WILL DEPART AND OVERTAKE THE VFR. HPN HAS NO PROB WITH THE OP 'ISSUE TFC, CONTACT DEP CTL.'

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.