Narrative:

Subsequent to flight I was questioned by the new company poi in regard to a squawk by maintenance. I had written up 2 items: one for a loose trim switch, and one for a failing turn and bank on the right side in an small aircraft logbook. Later I was questioned about a failed right sided gear pump, of which I had no knowledge. Apparently someone had told maintenance that the aircraft I had been flying was having problems. According to the FAA the pump shaft was sheered, but later maintenance informed me that they had run the right side, the handle did not return in 12 seconds, and was removed for inspection. The gears in the pump were found to be ineffective, however the shaft was not broken. I was quizzed about my checklist habits and was asked why I had not discovered the 'failed item.' I described my normal procedures and was unable to explain why someone else had informed the mechanics to evaluate the pump. I believe the item would have been drawn to anyone's attention, however, the inspector was already there for another problem and the director of maintenance had it out for me for some unknown reason.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ATX PLT QUESTIONED BY ACI REF LOGBOOK ITEMS APPEARING AS ACFT MAINT DISCREPANCIES.

Narrative: SUBSEQUENT TO FLT I WAS QUESTIONED BY THE NEW COMPANY POI IN REGARD TO A SQUAWK BY MAINT. I HAD WRITTEN UP 2 ITEMS: ONE FOR A LOOSE TRIM SWITCH, AND ONE FOR A FAILING TURN AND BANK ON THE R SIDE IN AN SMA LOGBOOK. LATER I WAS QUESTIONED ABOUT A FAILED R SIDED GEAR PUMP, OF WHICH I HAD NO KNOWLEDGE. APPARENTLY SOMEONE HAD TOLD MAINT THAT THE ACFT I HAD BEEN FLYING WAS HAVING PROBLEMS. ACCORDING TO THE FAA THE PUMP SHAFT WAS SHEERED, BUT LATER MAINT INFORMED ME THAT THEY HAD RUN THE R SIDE, THE HANDLE DID NOT RETURN IN 12 SECONDS, AND WAS REMOVED FOR INSPECTION. THE GEARS IN THE PUMP WERE FOUND TO BE INEFFECTIVE, HOWEVER THE SHAFT WAS NOT BROKEN. I WAS QUIZZED ABOUT MY CHKLIST HABITS AND WAS ASKED WHY I HAD NOT DISCOVERED THE 'FAILED ITEM.' I DESCRIBED MY NORMAL PROCS AND WAS UNABLE TO EXPLAIN WHY SOMEONE ELSE HAD INFORMED THE MECHANICS TO EVALUATE THE PUMP. I BELIEVE THE ITEM WOULD HAVE BEEN DRAWN TO ANYONE'S ATTN, HOWEVER, THE INSPECTOR WAS ALREADY THERE FOR ANOTHER PROBLEM AND THE DIRECTOR OF MAINT HAD IT OUT FOR ME FOR SOME UNKNOWN REASON.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.