![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 203086 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199202 |
| Day | Thu |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : rdu |
| State Reference | NC |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : rdu |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
| Flight Phase | descent : approach |
| Route In Use | approach : visual |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 300 |
| ASRS Report | 203086 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : far other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
| Consequence | Other |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
While flying a tight right downwind entry at 6000 ft my aircraft was cleared for a visual landing. We were #1 for the runway and first officer misjudged his turn to final (too close and too high). I felt we could continue approach at a steeper than normal rate. Approach continued and in fact was very steep and resulted in a landing at 3000 ft mark of runway. In retrospect we should have requested a 360 degree turn to make a shallower approach or gone around. Thus avoiding a fast and steep approach and landing.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR ON STABILIZED VISUAL APCH IS VERY UNSTABLE, LANDS LONG.
Narrative: WHILE FLYING A TIGHT R DOWNWIND ENTRY AT 6000 FT MY ACFT WAS CLRED FOR A VISUAL LNDG. WE WERE #1 FOR THE RWY AND FO MISJUDGED HIS TURN TO FINAL (TOO CLOSE AND TOO HIGH). I FELT WE COULD CONTINUE APCH AT A STEEPER THAN NORMAL RATE. APCH CONTINUED AND IN FACT WAS VERY STEEP AND RESULTED IN A LNDG AT 3000 FT MARK OF RWY. IN RETROSPECT WE SHOULD HAVE REQUESTED A 360 DEG TURN TO MAKE A SHALLOWER APCH OR GONE AROUND. THUS AVOIDING A FAST AND STEEP APCH AND LNDG.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.