Narrative:

I was enroute from ZZZ1 to ZZZ2. I was with ZZZ on frequency for at least 30 minutes; including cruise at FL280 until about 10;000 feet when I was handed off to ZZZ2 tower at about xa:00 local. I was aircraft X. The center controller was overwhelmed with workload: military; corporate planes; airliners; IFR departures and arrivals; and requests for deviations around numerous scattered thunderstorms. I live in [state X] so I am accustomed to busy ATC frequencies; but this controller was buried by the workload. There was another plane on frequency who requested a weather deviation. The controller said he had to stay on his route unless he descended from the flight levels to 16;000 feet. Other than 'military airspace;' the controller did not offer any information on the vertical or horizontal dimensions of this airspace. In my case; I was issued vectors around this airspace at least twice - but was not provided any information on how long I would be on the vector. Normally; I would have inquired about this - but the controller was so busy and the off-route vector was not creating any operational issues for me - so I silently endured to provide time to others who might need the controller's help more than I did.additionally; the controller seemed to be working a large swath of northern [state Y]. I would hear airplanes responding to his transmissions; but I couldn't hear many of the transmissions. Another pilot finally asked about this and the controller explained that he was using several different transmitter locations for frequency - and planes couldn't hear the faraway ground transmissions - but could hear the airborne replies.I am not faulting the controller. He was a competent; hard-working gentleman. But I am faulting ZZZ center for being understaffed and assigning such a large sector to one controller. In fact; after I landed at ZZZ2; I asked the ground controller for a phone for ZZZ. I called the supervisor at ZZZ center and told him his frequency controller was overwhelmed. The supervisor said he was aware of it; but was out of bodies.the controller's high workload and stress level was obvious - to the point that I felt safety was being compromised. If I had needed a greater level of ATC service or assistance; I am not confident that I would have received that help. And I don't know how much fuel pressure was created for the pilot who was forced to descend to 16;000 feet because the controller was too busy to explain his options or to create other options.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Pilot reported Controller was overworked and unable to respond to many frequency transmissions.

Narrative: I was enroute from ZZZ1 to ZZZ2. I was with ZZZ on frequency for at least 30 minutes; including cruise at FL280 until about 10;000 feet when I was handed off to ZZZ2 Tower at about XA:00 local. I was Aircraft X. The Center Controller was overwhelmed with workload: military; corporate planes; airliners; IFR departures and arrivals; and requests for deviations around numerous scattered thunderstorms. I live in [State X] so I am accustomed to busy ATC frequencies; but this Controller was buried by the workload. There was another plane on frequency who requested a weather deviation. The Controller said he had to stay on his route unless he descended from the flight levels to 16;000 feet. Other than 'military airspace;' the Controller did not offer any information on the vertical or horizontal dimensions of this airspace. In my case; I was issued vectors around this airspace at least twice - but was not provided any information on how long I would be on the vector. Normally; I would have inquired about this - but the Controller was so busy and the off-route vector was not creating any operational issues for me - so I silently endured to provide time to others who might need the Controller's help more than I did.Additionally; the Controller seemed to be working a large swath of northern [State Y]. I would hear airplanes responding to his transmissions; but I couldn't hear many of the transmissions. Another pilot finally asked about this and the Controller explained that he was using several different transmitter locations for frequency - and planes couldn't hear the faraway ground transmissions - but could hear the airborne replies.I am not faulting the Controller. He was a competent; hard-working gentleman. But I am faulting ZZZ Center for being understaffed and assigning such a large sector to one Controller. In fact; after I landed at ZZZ2; I asked the Ground Controller for a phone for ZZZ. I called the Supervisor at ZZZ Center and told him his frequency Controller was overwhelmed. The Supervisor said he was aware of it; but was out of bodies.The Controller's high workload and stress level was obvious - to the point that I felt safety was being compromised. If I had needed a greater level of ATC service or assistance; I am not confident that I would have received that help. And I don't know how much fuel pressure was created for the pilot who was forced to descend to 16;000 feet because the Controller was too busy to explain his options or to create other options.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.