![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 168645 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199101 |
| Day | Thu |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | atc facility : anc |
| State Reference | AK |
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC |
| Light | Dusk |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Widebody, Low Wing, 4 Turbojet Eng |
| Navigation In Use | Other |
| Flight Phase | ground other : taxi landing other |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Large Transport, Low Wing, 3 Turbojet Eng |
| Flight Phase | landing other |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | government : faa |
| Function | controller : local |
| Qualification | controller : non radar |
| ASRS Report | 168645 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | government : faa |
| Qualification | controller : non radar |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : ground critical non adherence : published procedure non adherence : required legal separation |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
| Consequence | Other |
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 6000 |
| Supplementary | |
| Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Intra Facility Coordination Failure Operational Error |
Narrative:
WX 1/2 mi south and bs. Air carrier X landed on runway 6R. Did not clear runway before air carrier Y landed. I thought air carrier X was clear, as he had turned 90 degrees and I thought he was exiting on the taxiway. The person working cabin coordinator was watching the asde and didn't say anything, so I assumed that there was nothing to worry about and that my visibility observation was correct. At the time there were 8 aircraft ready for departure on runway 14. We had bad WX, short staffing, heavy traffic through a lot of the day. The person on cabin coordinator was a newly checked out person. The runway confign is one of the most difficult we ever work. I could certainly have used a little more help. We have been after the state to correct a problem with the taxiway signs and their response is that they are setup technically correct, even though they cause a lot of confusion and pilots turning at the wrong taxiway.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR Y LNDG ON OCCUPIED RWY HAD LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION FROM ACR X. SYSTEM ERROR.
Narrative: WX 1/2 MI S AND BS. ACR X LANDED ON RWY 6R. DID NOT CLR RWY BEFORE ACR Y LANDED. I THOUGHT ACR X WAS CLR, AS HE HAD TURNED 90 DEGS AND I THOUGHT HE WAS EXITING ON THE TXWY. THE PERSON WORKING CABIN COORDINATOR WAS WATCHING THE ASDE AND DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING, SO I ASSUMED THAT THERE WAS NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT AND THAT MY VIS OBSERVATION WAS CORRECT. AT THE TIME THERE WERE 8 ACFT READY FOR DEP ON RWY 14. WE HAD BAD WX, SHORT STAFFING, HEAVY TFC THROUGH A LOT OF THE DAY. THE PERSON ON CABIN COORDINATOR WAS A NEWLY CHKED OUT PERSON. THE RWY CONFIGN IS ONE OF THE MOST DIFFICULT WE EVER WORK. I COULD CERTAINLY HAVE USED A LITTLE MORE HELP. WE HAVE BEEN AFTER THE STATE TO CORRECT A PROB WITH THE TXWY SIGNS AND THEIR RESPONSE IS THAT THEY ARE SETUP TECHNICALLY CORRECT, EVEN THOUGH THEY CAUSE A LOT OF CONFUSION AND PLTS TURNING AT THE WRONG TXWY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.