![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1556808 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201806 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | MROC.Airport |
| State Reference | FO |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Final Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | First Officer |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Instrument |
| Experience | Flight Crew Type 1767 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Other / Unknown |
Narrative:
While flying into mroc (san jose; costa rica); I noticed a small discrepancy between what is on the 10-7 pages and the instrument approach page. Due to terrain in the vicinity of the airfield; all missed approach and loss of engine departures require a sharp turn to the right. However; the 10-7 pages instruct us to complete the turn by the 113 radial; while the IAP states to complete the inbound turn by the 116 radial. At 4- DME; this difference of 3 radials is slightly less than 1/4 mile. So it's not a big difference; however it is different. Since the ILS page was more recent; we used that information (116 radial).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air carrier First Officer reported there is a discrepancy on the missed approach instructions per the Jeppesen chart versus the Company 10-7 chart.
Narrative: While flying into MROC (San Jose; Costa Rica); I noticed a small discrepancy between what is on the 10-7 pages and the Instrument Approach Page. Due to terrain in the vicinity of the airfield; all Missed Approach and Loss of Engine Departures require a sharp turn to the right. However; the 10-7 pages instruct us to complete the turn by the 113 radial; while the IAP states to complete the inbound turn by the 116 radial. At 4- DME; this difference of 3 radials is slightly less than 1/4 mile. So it's not a big difference; however it is different. Since the ILS page was more recent; we used that information (116 radial).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.